Page 592 of 1476
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:12 pm
by AugustWest
Jungle Rat wrote:30 years really? That would put me at 14. Don't remember the terriost issue back then. Festival seating. Maybe.
Rat, sometimes I know you pretend to be retarded so it makes it difficult to distinguish from when you actually are retarded, but the Taliban was started in the late seventies along with the mujaheddin to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:19 pm
by innocentbystander
AugustWest wrote:Jungle Rat wrote:30 years really? That would put me at 14. Don't remember the terriost issue back then. Festival seating. Maybe.
Rat, sometimes I know you pretend to be retarded so it makes it difficult to distinguish from when you actually are retarded, but the Taliban was started in the late seventies along with the mujaheddin to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.
You are setting him up for the "liberal" response to say that this was all "our fault" because we
armed them and
left them once the Soviets left Afghanistan.
I am pre-emptively disassembling the Strawman we all know Rat will erect....
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:31 pm
by bluetick
innocentbystander wrote:bluetick wrote:Irony, thy name is PNN.
Walter Williams deplores the idea of women in combat. Walt is black.
The army is not a socialogical labratory; to be effective it must be organized and trained according to the principles which will ensure success...Experiments are a danger to efficiency, discipline, and moral and would result in ultimate defeat. - Col. E. Householder, 1941, explaining why negroes would not be integrated into combat roles.
Strawman
Women != Negroes
Damn the luck. Back in the day you could slip irony right past the deranged.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:36 pm
by AugustWest
'72 olympics Rat.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:39 pm
by AugustWest
Women probably shouldn't be loading artillery shells into howitzers but they excel at sniping, as pilots, and spotters. They certainly have their place in combat.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:42 pm
by AlabamAlum
Spotting? That surprises me. Men usually do much better at detecting minute movements at a distance. Or so I was told....
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:47 pm
by AugustWest
AlabamAlum wrote:Spotting? That surprises me. Men usually do much better at detecting minute movements at a distance. Or so I was told....
Women supposedly have more patience and a higher pain threshold meaning they can stay on station longer. probably more important to be able to watch the first thousand yards for 8 hours at a time than spotting movement 1800 yards away for a couple of hours.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:00 pm
by AlabamAlum
Ahh. Sounds logical.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:07 pm
by innocentbystander
bluetick wrote:Damn the luck. Back in the day you could slip irony right past the deranged.
Snark, be gone.
This is a serious topic. Snark is intended to take something indefensible that is serious (like women in certain combat roles) and either obfuscate OR put the entire discussion out of bounds for political correctness. That is what you (Mr Strawman) have attempted. An 8th grader can do the same. I expect that type of snarky behavior of them (or of female writers who can't have a serious conversation about this because it
hurts them.)
You want me to start calling you Maureen Dowd?
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:10 pm
by innocentbystander
AugustWest wrote:'72 olympics Rat.
Watch it Auggie. You keep making sense, he might tell you to kill yourself.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:24 pm
by AugustWest
innocentbystander wrote:AugustWest wrote:'72 olympics Rat.
Watch it Auggie. You keep making sense, he might tell you to kill yourself.
There will always be nutjobs. I could get over "72, then came Lockerbie, the Beirut barracks bombing, the Nairobi embassy bombing, the USS Cole, the WTC 2 times, Mumbai, The Beslan school siege, girls getting acid thrown in their face for going to school, and I'm just fucking sick of it. Iran is probably the least of the offenders. Saudi Arabia the worst. I said it years ago and I'll say it again. We need to bombard those Islamic fucks with eastern NC style barbque , porn and rock and roll. the one's that don't like it, fuck 'em, roll 'em in pig fat and shoot 'em.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:30 pm
by Cletus
innocentbystander wrote:
Read the Koran. Frightening shit if one believes everything that is in it and acts on those beliefs (....fundamentally.)
It's not any worse than your bible.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:31 pm
by bluetick
Toemeesleather wrote:“I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters.”
Frank Lloyd Wright
"In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for;
as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican." - H.L. Mencken
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:35 pm
by hedge
"THAT GUY (Mustafa/Diego/Hamed/Myung) can fight a revolution. He can go out in the bush, living off of bugs and ditchwater, because his life is crap."
I'm here a week now... waiting for a mission... getting softer. Every minute I stay in this room, I get weaker, and every minute Charlie squats in the bush, he gets stronger. Each time I looked around the walls moved in a little tighter...
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:55 pm
by hedge
"It is comments like these, that help reinforce the my judgement that I am correct in not dignifying any of your posts with a response. This is why I shun you."
Wow, way to "not respond" to Johnette's Daddy, IB. No better way to "shun" somebody (are you Amish?) than to respond with several sentences letting everyone know that you are shunning/ignoring/not responding to the offending party. LMAO...
"We need to bombard those Islamic fucks with eastern NC style barbque , porn and rock and roll. the one's that don't like it, fuck 'em, roll 'em in pig fat and shoot 'em."
Why stop there? Anybody who doesn't LOVE the Grateful Dead needs to be shot...
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:02 pm
by AugustWest
Why stop there? Anybody who doesn't LOVE the Grateful Dead needs to be shot...
That's a little exclusive. I draw the line at Eastern NC Barbque. Any tomato based sauce loving fucks should be burned at the stake....LALLALALALALALLALALLALALA Vinegar is great!!!! All praise to vinegar!!!!LALLALALALALALLALALALLLA
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:21 pm
by Owlman
Toemeesleather wrote:Owlman wrote:The second ammendment was not for hunting. It was to ensure that the citizens would have recourse over out of control gubment. To think otherwise is just silly.
Neither of those statements are correct. A well-regulated militia being necessarry to the maintenance of a free state, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. They primarily (not the only reason) were concerned with the protection of the country from the superpowers of the day, France and England, something they rightfully should have been scared of. The purpose of the militia was not to protect the individual from the federal govt. The POTUS is the head of the militia.
Personal opinion...Bovine scatology...
Not really. After all, the primary reason is more likely to be something that is actually written in the Amendment as opposed to something that isn't any where in the Amendment at all.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:39 pm
by Owlman
sardis wrote:Owlman is totally ignoring the writings of the federalists and anti-federalists when they hashed out this amendment.
No, I'm not. I just look at all the writings and not just the ones that fit one point of view. I also know some of the earlier court rulings including Cruikshank and Presser v. Illinois.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:17 am
by bluetick
Why is the MSM [still] running with all this good economic news? Dow reaching for new high, hiring is up, new home sales up 20%...
give it a rest ffs...you already jobbed the election result
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:29 am
by bluetick
Foxbusiness Headlines: China to Overtake US Economy in 2030, Chicken Wing Shortage for Super Bowl Week?, Social Security Disability Outlook Bad
ahhh