hedge wrote:" At 74, he'd be 5 years OLDER than Reagan when he got elected."
Hils will be pushing 70 herself by 2016...
Which is why she may not run.
Reagan was 2 weeks shy of 71 when he was inaugurated.
Hillary would be 69 and 3 months on Jan. 20, 2017.
Ironically, I think that age might be a motivating factor for her supporters among women. I'm of the opinion that there'll be plenty of baby-boomer women telling her that she HAS to run to prove that an older woman still has value. You all gave her the moniker "pig ankled harridan" but I expect to see a mountain of support from older, menopausal/post-menopausal women as a way of validating themselves.
"Yes, my husband left me for a woman 22 years younger, but I'll show him!"
"My sons think I'm out-of-touch and don't want to be bothered with me, but I'll show them!"
"My daughter laughs at my 'mom jeans' and my hairdo, but I'll show her!"
We as men can laugh it off, but:
1 - these bitches have money - big money;
2 - they are a HUGE voting bloc - women over 50 vote in bigger numbers than any other demographic; and
3 - white women will have someone to vote for who LOOKS like them.
Obama won the women's vote - but lost healthily among white women. That won't happen to Hils. She'll get a majority of white women and damn near sweep non-white women. That's probably 51% of the electorate before a man even casts a ballot.
And (lest we forget) - she now has actually credibility from her own works as a Senator and Secretary of State (which was the traditional launching pad for Presidents in our early history). From a "gravitas" standpoint, who will the GOP have?
*Condi Rice? Heh. Has gravitas, but let's see a black woman get past Iowa. Some of the best jokes I've heard were from Republicans involving Condi's DSL.
*Paul Ryan? No gravitas, couldn't carry his own home state.
*Piyush Jindal? Not after you all left him hanging in his State of the Union response. Plus I cannot see the Posse Commitatus and Identity Christians lining up to support a Catholic whose parents are still ardent Hindus.
*Rick Perry? How the Governor of Texas has made himself into a national joke is bewildering, but he has.
*Chris Christie? Could beat a Dem, but couldn't get the GOP nomination.
*Tom Corbett? Not a bad sleeper, unfortunately "Tom Corbett - Space Cadet!" was a popular TV series in the 50s and his opponents would find a way to work it in to the dialogue. Plus, his approval ratings are sinking.
*Marco Rubio? Possibly - he is latino . . . but the
wrong latino. There is a split between Caribbean heritage Latinos (Cuban, Puerto Rican) and Central American heritage Latinos (Mexican, Salvadorean, etc.) over immigration. Cubans have had unfettered access to immigration but have supported the GOPs tough anti-immigrant stances, which is a sore spot for Republican Mexican-Americans, which is a bigger bloc. Also, Rubio's BIL is heavily tied to the Columbian drug cartels and Rubio himself has had some issues with misappropriating campaign funds. Another looming issue is Rubio's being caught in a lie about his family history. He claims his parents escaped the Castro regime in 1959 under threat of death, but apparently his parents had moved to Florida several years earlier . . .