The Goat Pen

Ah well. I took a shot.

never...tug at the sleeve..of the man in the tinfoil hat

I dont believe there are any qualities of a good man that would be different than the qualities of a good woman. Certainly not any "objective" ones. How can you list the qualities that objectively make something "good?" You are a fucking nutcase.

innocentbystander wrote:

Jungle Rat wrote:1) Treat women with respect (she does make your dinner)
2) Don't be a dickface like IB (nobody like a dickface)
3) Work hard & provide. No mother with kids should have to work
4) Claim Sundays (for football of course)
5) Treat your kids with love, (even if they are female).
6) Respect your mother (even though she's female)
7) Punch anyone like IB in the face and walk away. Laughing.

There's my list you jackwagon.

Not good enough. The ONLY thing in your list (that is entirely objective) is #3. Everything else is either subjective (and should be disregarded), a joke, or (if serious) a criminal matter that get you arrested and incarcerated. Because if anyone batters me, they go jail and I press charges.

So now there are terms on answering the question? "Not good enough"? To who? A fucking Boston punk? I think I'll be OK. Noboy gives a shit about Boston punks.

You asked for a list & you got one homo. Where's yours?

Working hard is objective?

I can piss John Hancock's Declaration of Independance signature into a snow bank. Ain't a woman alive that can do that, by God.

other than that....male centric-wise...I'm drawing a blank

aTm wrote:I dont believe there are any qualities of a good man that would be different than the qualities of a good woman. Certainly not any "objective" ones. How can you list the qualities that objectively make something "good?" You are a fucking nutcase.

No I'm not a nutcase.

I'm just someone who understand that if I'm a cruise ship with my wife and daughter, OBJECTIVELY, my wife and daughter get lifeboats first because men getting lifeboats LAST on a sinking ship is one of many quality that makes a man a good man.

Do we understand each other aTm? Do you understand the point of this excesize? Do ALL of you understand the importance of the question and how I framed it? Or am I being obtuse? Because I've had just about enough of this politically correct happy horseshit that there aren't ANY qualities that make a good man that also make a good woman.

Extra credit aTm: why do women and children get lifeboats first?

Jungle Rat wrote:You asked for a list & you got one homo. Where's yours?

One item is right above this post.

I dont think you know the difference between objective and subjective.

aTm wrote:I dont think you know the difference between objective and subjective.

I do.

I also know how to apologize to someone after wrongfully calling them a fucking nutcase. I hope you realize that you are WRONG aTm that there ARE differences in the qualities that make a man a good man vs what makes a woman a good woman.

innocentbystander wrote:

aTm wrote:I dont think you know the difference between objective and subjective.

I do.

I also know how to apologize to someone after wrongfully calling them a fucking nutcase. I hope you realize that you are WRONG aTm that there ARE differences in the qualities that make a man a good man vs what makes a woman a good woman.

You need to be locked up. You are mental.

Please give us your location right now so we can help. You are out there.

Jungle Rat wrote:Please give us your location right now so we can help. You are out there.

Hey man, I'm not the one who claims he wants to punch people and calls people homos.

Apologizing is a subjective cultural norm. A cultural norm which is not generally followed in any of these forums, nor is what I said outside of the subjective cultural norm as far as interaction here, and it (that you are a nutcase) is my subjective opinion of the ridiculous arguments you are trying to make over what I will objectively call the last 25 posts or so that you've made.

aTm wrote:Apologizing is a subjective cultural norm. A cultural norm which is not generally followed in any of these forums, nor is what I said outside of the subjective cultural norm as far as interaction here, and it (that you are a nutcase) is my subjective opinion of the ridiculous arguments you are trying to make over what I will objectively call the last 25 posts or so that you've made.

Nice rhetoric.

Another good quality that makes a man a good man is his ability to swallow his pride. I think you need to work on that quality aTm.

Whats objective about that one?

aTm wrote:Whats objective about that one?

(IB to aTm) "You are retarded."

(aTm to IB) "No I'm not. Here is my degree from Texas A&M University. They don't give those to retards."

(IB to himself) He got me. He's right. I'm wrong. I want people at the Goat Pen and the PNNery to have respect for me as a man. I know what I have to do.

(IB to aTm) "I'm sorry aTm. I was wrong. If I've hurt your feelings, please forgive me."

Make no mistake aTm, saying sorry matters. Words objectively matter. Objectively, a man is NOT a good man if he is functionally incapable of swallowing his pride.

Now having said that let me say this, there is absolutely nothing that you (or anyone) at the forum could say to me that would hurt my feelings. I don't give any of you that kind of power. But at the same time, I want to be a good man, part of being a good man is to admit when I am wrong (something I struggle with everyday.) And that includes this forum, or else why post here? And I certainly hope I don't have the power to hurt your feelings, but if I do, then let me apologize in advance.

he really doesn't know the difference between objective and subjective

I wouldn't have believed that anybody could be as fucked up and stupid as IB. But he has proven me wrong...

Owlman wrote:he really doesn't know the difference between objective and subjective

Yes I do. Here's the difference....

On November 14th, 2012, K-State is the best football team in the country because they are #1 in the current BCS poll. That poll is entirely subjective and thus. my statement is debatable.

On November 14th, 2012, the New York football Giants are the defending Superbowl Champions. That is entirely objective. There is nothing to debate.

Want another one?

The SEC is the strongest football conference in all of college football because the last six Mythical National Champions were from the SEC. That is entirely subjective because it could be debated.

Hedge and DookSucks both think that their shit don't stink because they graduated UNC and didn't have to settle attending Auggie's NCState. That is entirely objective. There is nothing to debate.