Page 519 of 756

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 2:53 pm
by Professor Tiger
Pulling your starting QB with a 25-2 record, and replacing him with a true freshman with better passing skills, who goes on to overcome a double digit deficit in one half to win the National Championship... sheer genius and giant huevos.

I have waited until today to say the following, but it is now time:

Nick Saban is the greatest college football coach in my lifetime. He just surpassed Bear Bryant in that category.

That is all.

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 3:00 pm
by crashcourse
I saw a report that said if that kid didn't play in the championship game he was transferring away from Alabama

wonder if true if that had a part in this

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:15 pm
by Professor Tiger
Tua-whatever-his-name-is will almost certainly start from now on. That puts Hurts out of a job. Maybe we can get him to transfer to Auburn. Almost all of our QB's are transfers from other programs nowadays.

On that note, the same goes for UGA's Eason, who has Fromm ahead of him and incoming 5 star recruit Justin Fields.

We'll gladly take either one.

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:32 pm
by AlabamAlum
Eason is going to Washington. Wouldn't surprise me to see Hurts at Texas.

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:29 pm
by hedge
Hurts is such a good runner, Alabama should run a 2 QB offense. Toss the ball back and forth rugby style and either get an open receiver of run it. It would work...

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:32 pm
by AlabamAlum
I'll pass it along to Nick asap.

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:39 pm
by eCat
I don't think he leaves Bama

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:49 pm
by Professor Tiger
Probably so. The loss of income would be tough on him.

Unless he goes to Texas, as AA suggested. With all that oil money, they probably have a higher pay scale that even Bama.

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:37 pm
by DooKSucks
I read where Texas was likely.

I would kill to have him at UNC, but, alas, we're stuck waiting on a ten win season once every ten to twenty years...

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:46 pm
by Jungle Rat
Why would he leave the dynasty he created? Boredom?

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:51 pm
by DooKSucks
Jungle Rat wrote:Why would he leave the dynasty he created? Boredom?
Hurts, not Saban

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:27 pm
by Professor Tiger
DooKSucks wrote:... alas, we're stuck waiting on a ten win season once every ten to twenty years...
Sounds like UNC football is a lot like Auburn basketball. It’s what you do to pass the time during the off season.

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:48 pm
by crotch
Professor Tiger wrote:
DooKSucks wrote:... alas, we're stuck waiting on a ten win season once every ten to twenty years...
Sounds like UNC football is a lot like Auburn basketball. It’s what you do to pass the time during the off season.

....as is Kentucky football

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:59 pm
by Professor Tiger
Correct. Just like the SEC keeps Kentucky around only to give us at least one respectable basketball program, and so that SEC east football teams have at least one easy win every season.

The SEC also keeps Vandy around to give us at least one academically respectable school, and to give SEC east teams at least one easy win every season.

SEC East teams need a lot of help to keep up with the West.

Re: College Football

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 2:51 pm
by hedge
No doubt Kentucky suffers some bad losses most years, but my impression is that they also hang in there pretty well in plenty of game, too. That's cold comfort for their fans - a loss is still a loss - but I've never thought of UK as being an automatic slaughter game for the powerhouses of the SEC. My impression is that if UK was in the ACC, they would regularly be in the upper tier. Maybe not on the level with Clemson and FSU, but certainly in the top 4 or so most years...

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:51 pm
by eCat
that may be the best thing that Stoops has going for him - its not often we get blanked by an opponent

but we still celebrate signing 3 star guys and jucos - As long as we are in the SEC -that's probably how its going to stay.

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:56 pm
by Professor Tiger
UK knows their role.

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:31 pm
by hedge
"but we still celebrate signing 3 star guys and jucos "

Same with UNC. The difference is, as we saw the past few years (before this past year), you can build an ACC powerhouse with those types of players. Not a given by any means, but those types of guys, if they're the right guys and everything else comes together, can give you a season or two of competing for a conference title in the ACC. But then they graduate and you go 3-9 with the crop of freshman and sophomore 3 star players you're left with...

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 10:20 pm
by Professor Tiger
That’s why UNC has basketball.

I am saddened to see my adopted favorite basketball team is rated so low. That is exceedingly rare.

I am also saddened to see my adopted favorite basketball team rated this far below our biggest rival, Dook (which Dooksucks once eloquently called “that NAMBLA chapter in Durham.”) I knew they would be good when they signed a player from my old high school, Wendell Carter. I watched him play last year, and he was an absolute beast. I knew he would help somebody win a lot of games, even as a freshman.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:16 pm
by Jungle Rat
I hope sardis didn't jump off one of those bridges. Sorta