The Goat Pen

Professor Tiger wrote:My personal favorite case of rampant voter fraud by Democrats is the 2008 Senate election in Minnesota. 1,099 felons voted in an election Franken won by 312 votes. 177 people were convicted - not charged, but convicted - of voter fraud. That stolen election gave the Dem's the last vote they needed to pass Obamacare.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/york-when ... JPtKYWkBok

Yet they would have us believe that voter fraud, like the mafia, doesn't exist.

Well that and corrupt prosecutors in Alaska who helped Stevens lose the election there. Remember the judge there was furious with the misconduct and nothing ever should have been brought to trial.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1000771/
2008 HBO's Recount : THE Story of the 2000 Presidential Election

90 minute runtime of how the biggest election fraud of all time was perpetrated...in HD!

bluetick wrote:You can't claim something as outrageous as "the president says the US should have their wealth redistributed to other nations" and not offer any proof. Yet you do this stuff all the time. Words have meaning, even yours. "Yes maam, I may have said your condition is terminal. But I was speaking more about your total outlook...we all gotta go sometime."

I gave you a link Tick, just for you. It was from the documentary.

He has said multiple times he believes in wealth redistribution, and the documentary gives good evidence to the fact that he's not just meaning within the US.

LMMFAO...Now it starts before election day.

Miami-Dade wants to keep their early voting open later and longer than everyone else. Being reported right now on fox.

You can't make this stuff up.

wow...

Utility workers pelted with eggs after Bridgeport, Conn. mayor blasts provider

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/02/br ... z2B5nyviMo

Big Orange Junky wrote:

bluetick wrote:You can't claim something as outrageous as "the president says the US should have their wealth redistributed to other nations" and not offer any proof. Yet you do this stuff all the time. Words have meaning, even yours. "Yes maam, I may have said your condition is terminal. But I was speaking more about your total outlook...we all gotta go sometime."

I gave you a link Tick, just for you. It was from the documentary.

He has said multiple times he believes in wealth redistribution, and the documentary gives good evidence to the fact that he's not just meaning within the US.

Goddamn it, give me Obama's quote or STFU. I need to believe you're not that dense. Your link says DeSOUZA SAYS obama wants to redistribute wealth to other nations. Show me a sign that you know the difference...

Good ad...

[youtube]m_1ZT1hwpng[/youtube]

Really...

Chapel Hill Killer Registered At and Voted From Mental Hospital

Dozens of mentally disabled registered in stepped-up efforts by state

http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusiv ... ml?id=9635

puterbac wrote:Really...

Chapel Hill Killer Registered At and Voted From Mental Hospital

Dozens of mentally disabled registered in stepped-up efforts by state

http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusiv ... ml?id=9635

No felony, no misdemeanor, didn't even get a ticket...says here he was found not guilty. Nothing illegal or improper about him voting that I can read in your story.

Are you saying the mentally disabled should be disenfranchised from voting?

More than you ever wanted to read on polling, modeling and statistics...

On Polling Models, Skewed & Unskewed

Still Out On That Limb

By: Dan McLaughlin (Diary) | October 31st, 2012 at 07:05 PM

http://www.redstate.com/2012/10/31/on-p ... -unskewed/

Conclusion

We can’t know until Election Day who is right. I stand by my view that Obama is losing independent voters decisively, because the national and state polls both support that thesis. I stand by my view that Republican turnout will be up significantly from recent-historic lows in 2008 in the key swing states (Ohio, Wisconsin, Colorado) and nationally, because the post-2008 elections, the party registration data, the early-voting and absentee-ballot numbers, and the Rasmussen and Gallup national party-ID surveys (both of which have solid track records) all point to this conclusion. I stand by my view that no countervailing evidence outside of poll samples shows a similar surge above 2008 levels in Democratic voter turnout, as would be needed to offset Romney’s advantage with independents and increased GOP voter turnout. And I stand by the view that a mechanical reading of polling averages is an inadequate basis to project an event unprecedented in American history: the re-election of a sitting president without a clear-cut victory in the national popular vote.

Perhaps, despite the paucity of evidence to the contrary, these assumptions are wrong. But if they are correct, no mathematical model can provide a convincing explanation of how Obama is going to win re-election. He remains toast.

bluetick wrote:

puterbac wrote:Really...

Chapel Hill Killer Registered At and Voted From Mental Hospital

Dozens of mentally disabled registered in stepped-up efforts by state

http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusiv ... ml?id=9635

No felony, no misdemeanor, didn't even get a ticket...says here he was found not guilty. Nothing illegal or improper about him voting that I can read in your story.

Are you saying the mentally disabled should be disenfranchised from voting?

I would say it depends on what level if mental disability there is. Do they actually know what they are doing or is someone just voting by proxy through them? And I've never been a big believer in insanity defense making you not guilty. Hell it makes you that much more unpredictable and dangerous.

Are these headlines being shown on network TV at all or is there a Libya style blackout? Just asking.

Drivers Waiting 6 Hours For Gas in NYC...
Tempers Rise in Wake of Storm...
'They forgot about us'...
CHUCK SCHUMER CONFRONTED: 'We Are Gonna Die!'
CUOMO: 'No reason to panic'...
Utility workers pelted with eggs...
Misery...
Mile-long lines, price hits $6...
Residents Furious RED CROSS Offering Cookies & Hot Chocolate, Not Blankets Or Clothes...
Two massive generators power NY media, not masses...
Staten Islanders Plead for Help: 'We Need Food'...
'Please don't leave us'...
VIDEO: Stranded New Yorkers Defecating in Apartment Buildings...
DIRE...

puterbac wrote:Not making light of anything, but this was a Cat 1 (barely) hurricane. From the coverage you'd think that the scene from the Day After Tomorrow just happened to NYC.

Personally, I don't think this got enough attention.

I would like to officially nominate it as Best Original PNN Quote of the Year.

THE_WIZARD_ wrote:puter...do you really thing the left wing media would blow a storm out of proportion so as to gain ratings and allow an inept liberal to have a chance at looking presidential less than a week before the election? No way!

Although there IS competition and puter's may not be a slam dunk...

I will continue to stick with the scientific approach used by Nate Silver: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.co ... vorite/?hp

bluetick wrote:

puterbac wrote:Not making light of anything, but this was a Cat 1 (barely) hurricane. From the coverage you'd think that the scene from the Day After Tomorrow just happened to NYC.

Personally, I don't think this got enough attention.

I would like to officially nominate it as Best Original PNN Quote of the Year.

Again...not to make light of anything, but the coverage was sensational as hell compared to much stronger storms that happen often in the gulf coast and below the mason dixon line.

I never said it was political. Is more to do with the fact that the media lives there and they are experiencing it which makes it a much bigger deal.

So is this the GOP getting suckered in or is there a betting chance....

NYTIMES: PA 'tilting toward Romney'...

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/us/po ... f=politics

Good to see puter already working on his excuses for Tuesday night.

SnoodGator wrote:I will continue to stick with the scientific approach used by Nate Silver: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.co ... vorite/?hp

Thats fine, but that is the 538 he is talking about in his discourse.

I find it very hard to believe that D's are gonna show up in same levels or higher than in 2008. It defies logic, history, and the enthusiasm gap as well as independents being polled.

Ah good ole Harry...

REID: WE WON'T WORK WITH ROMNEY

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... ith-Romney