Page 6 of 1476

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 10:01 pm
by 10ac


White gal must of dissed them hos. Glad to see management on top of things.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 10:33 pm
by It's me Karen
Let me at those bitches. And the camerman. And the wimpy guy who stood there barely doing anything. High five to the older lady.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:34 am
by Owlman
GBJs wrote:
puterbac wrote: Of course, if the NLRB doesn't like it, I'm sure some of the Southern states can seceed again.

That's been tried before.

Didn't work.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:37 am
by Dr. Strangelove
The South got whipped the last time they pulled a stunt like that. It may be time to remind them of their inherent inferiority again.

About the McDonald's brawl, Smoking Gun says it was a "transgendered woman" they were beating up. Whole thing is weird

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/mcd ... um=twitter

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:21 pm
by 10ac
Oh, she/he/it was a Democrat. Still, that was a bit much.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 4:22 pm
by Big Orange Junky
LMBO

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 4:46 pm
by GBJs
Dr. Strangelove wrote:The South got whipped the last time they pulled a stunt like that. It may be time to remind them of their inherent inferiority again.
Yeah, but y'all ain't got the steel mills anymore, and a bunch of wimps that want to go on strike won't cut it for fightin'. Plus, Obama will be yer Pres and you've got to admit he's quite a step down from Lincoln.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 1:48 pm
by Professor Tiger
Do you realize there isn't a single canon factory in the whole North?

Great article about CA vs TX. This is classic California approach to its problems:

California, by contrast, seems to constantly lose focus. Several Democrats who agreed to go on the Texas trip were pressured by public-employee unions to drop out—and many did. And just as Texas business leaders were testifying about how the state's tort reforms had improved job creation, word came of California's latest priority: On April 14, the state senate passed a bill mandating that all public school children learn the history of disabled and gay Americans.


And Happy Easter to those inclined.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:46 pm
by Professor Tiger
Scary but thought-provoking article by Walter Williams, a conservative so reliable that he is sometimes trusted with the EIB microphone:

No Matter What

By Dr. Walter Williams

Can President Obama be defeated in 2012? No. He can't. I am going on record as saying that President Barak Obama will win a second term. The media won't tell you this because a good election campaign means hundreds of millions (or in Obama's case billions) of dollars to them in advertising. But the truth is, there simply are no conditions under which Barak Obama can be defeated in 2012.

The quality of the Republican candidate doesn't matter. Obama gets reelected. Nine percent unemployment? No problem. Obama will win. Gas prices moving toward five dollars a gallon? He still wins. The economy soars or goes into the gutter. Obama wins. War in the Middle East? He wins a second term. America's role as the leading Superpower disappears? Hurrah for Barak Obama! The U.S. government rushes toward bankruptcy, the dollar continues to sink on world markets and the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation fueled by Obama's extraordinary deficit spending? Obama wins handily.

You are crazy Williams. Don't you understand how volatile politics can be when overall economic, government, and world conditions are declining? Sure I do. And that's why I know Obama will win. The American people are notoriously ignorant of economics. And economics is the key to why Obama should be defeated. Even when Obama's policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the American people are going to believe the bait-and-switch tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use to explain why it isn't his fault. After all, things were much worse than understood when he took office.

Obama's reelection is really a very, very simple math problem. Consider the following:

1) Blacks will vote for Obama blindly. Period. Doesn't matter what he does. It's a race thing. He's one of us,

2) College educated women will vote for Obama. Though they will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory. It's really not more complex than that,

3) Liberals will vote for Obama. He is their great hope,

4) Democrats will vote for Obama. He is the leader of their party and his coattails will carry them to victory nationwide,

5) Hispanics will vote for Obama. He is the path to citizenship for those who are illegal and Hispanic leaders recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic Party,

6) Union members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama. He is their key to money and power in business, state and local politics,

7) Big Business will support Obama. They already have. He has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained largely from his connections with Big Business and is gaining more everyday. Big Business loves Obama because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they support his social and political agenda,

8) The media love him. They may attack the people who work for him, but they love him. After all, to not love him would be racist,

9) Most other minorities and special interest groups will vote for him. Oddly, the overwhelming majority of Jews and Muslims will support him because they won't vote Republican. American Indians will support him. Obviously homosexuals tend to vote Democratic. And lastly,

10) Approximately half of independents will vote for Obama. And he doesn't need anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups previously mentioned. The President will win an overwhelming victory in 2012.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:16 pm
by GBJs
It's Easter. Wait 'til tomorrow to post something that sickening.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:11 pm
by 10ac
Doesn't matter, we've been fucked since about '94. No hop. Over. Fini. Kaput. Down the shitter....

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:53 pm
by sardis
Prof, haven't I been saying Oprama is a lock for 2012 for about a year now? You won't believe until Walter Williams says so...

I'm hurt.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:18 pm
by AugustWest
frankly, at this point if America goes into the shitter we deserve what we get. we've had 20 years to change course and we havent.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:30 pm
by Jungle Rat
We tried.

fuckin Bush

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:45 pm
by Professor Tiger
I wonder what Sardis thinks about Obama's reelection chances.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:12 am
by Hacksaw
AugustWest wrote:frankly, at this point if America goes into the shitter we deserve what we get. we've had 20 years to change course and we havent.
Very true. And, frankly, I blame the Republicans. They waited for half a century for an opportunity to control both houses of Congress and the WH, simultaneously. And when they finally got it, they blew it. I said at the time that when the dems regained control, they would increase deficit spending to levels never-before-seen, since they now know that the GOP offers no real alternative. And I have been proven right.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:23 am
by sardis
Professor Tiger wrote:I wonder what Sardis thinks about Obama's reelection chances.

A Sporty lock!

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:33 am
by Dora
It would be interesting if the Repubs would come up with a decent contender.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:29 am
by bluetick
Williams makes a big issue of race in his pronouncement that oprama will win re-election. Which he can do as a black conservative. Because he's black. Negroid. Ancestors from Africa black.

The latest national poll on the subject, btw, says 47% republicans believe oprama was born in Kenya (22% "don't know"). 98% of those Rs are white, but it's probably better to let the Williams and Sowells and Elders carry the water wrt racism in the medial. With their unique perspective and all.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:32 am
by Dora
>Because he's black. Negroid. Ancestors from Africa black.

As opposed to some other type of black?