bluetick wrote:I missed the part where the jury agreed that the case shouldn't have gone to trial.
Nobody said that.
Moderators: The Talent, Hacksaw, bluetick, puterbac, 10ac
bluetick wrote:I missed the part where the jury agreed that the case shouldn't have gone to trial.
You said the po-po/DA said there wasn't enough evidence to go in front of a grand jury, and then ended by saying the jury also agreed there wasn't enough evidence to give to a grand jury. Obviously your sentence structure and word usage didn't match your intended point - that neither group thought GZ was guilty.Toemeesleather wrote:Yep, stoopid local yokels said not enough evidence to give to a grand jury....//...turns out a jury agreed w/the local yokels.
"turns out a jury agreed w/the local yokels."Toemeesleather wrote:bluetick wrote:I missed the part where the jury agreed that the case shouldn't have gone to trial.
Nobody said that.
oh yeah. Try to be a sports fan of the 3 biggest sports in the U.S. and ignore ESPN. Don't believe it.Toemeesleather wrote:Yet another reason to ignore ESPN...
http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/more_spo ... IShURrvUGO
Bengals weren't on MNF last year?Jungle Rat wrote:Haven't watched ESPN for over a year now. If I do check in its at 50 past the hour for the top plays. Besides that I have no interest in the Yankees, Red Sox or Lakers.