So Palin was a city council member, a mayor and a governor of one of the 60 states. She was also a mother and homemaker, which is, apparently, seen as a deficiency by most dems.
Obama was a relatively inexperienced political insider from one of the most notoriously corrupt political machines in America.
Advantage, Palin.
What has Obama done that makes him worse than say George W. Bush? What horrors has Obama brought?
You won't see me defending Bush's economic policies. But Obama has only made him look good by comparison. The horrors are multitude. Every day brings more bad economic news. If you haven't noticed the reporting (even in the Obama-friendly 9:1 media) then I doubt you'll take my word for it. But just as a for instance, when unemployment was around 8%, Obama predicted that it would go to 10%, unless his spending plans were implemented. He promised that his plan would halt the rise in unemployment -- shovel-ready jobs and all that. He's added $4 trillion to the national debt since he became President and the economy is only worse-off. Why should we not hold him accountable for his policies having the reverse effect that he said they would?
And, really...how could things be much worse, no matter who else we elected?