Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

[hedge]

"Liberals are the dumbest mother fuckers on the planet. They will vote for a liberal even if it means their life will suck worse....which is pretty much the case every time...lib politicians make it worse for EVERYONE...but conservatives...well they level the playing field so people who actually work for their money GET TO KEEP IT...oh the horror."

Another great post from the self-proclaimed "independent" (LMAO) Wiz, who also claims the repubs are just as bad as the dems. But he can only hide (i.e., lie about) his real loyalties but so long and so much. Keep beating that nonpartisan, "independent" drum, Wizzie. You're not fooling anybody. Except yourself...

[THE_WIZARD_]

Notice I said "liberals" not "democrats" idiot. It's the ideology I am attacking...not the party. Hell you can't tell much difference between a D and an R these days anyway.

[hedge]

"IB is hardly a Quaker. More like a Puritan."

My bad, I'm not up on the differences b/w Quakers, Puritans, Mennonites, Hutterites, etc. But you're right, I should've said Puritan. Reminds me of the HL Mencken quote about Puritanism, that sums up IB to a T: "Purianism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy." Except in IB's case, substitute "mortal terror" for "haunting fear"....

[aTm]

The idea that singles didn't have sex with each other, ever in history for fear of Christ or any other reason, is pure bullshit.

[Owlman]

s pure bullshit

Applies to virtually everything IB says

[bluetick]

time to move things forward..

Sweet irony, thy name is tick.

You too, toe. Maybe not a master tailgater, but you know enough about cfb to be dangerous (yeller jackets, pfft) and most of all you are a damn fine American.

You actually whine less than most and that is a surprise.

[Toemeesleather]

Fishin' over football.


Makes me a master baiter....

[innocentbystander]

IB is hardly a Quaker. More like a Puritan. Quakers don't support war for the most part. IB supports war as long as it's others going to fight.

The biggest change in the sexual revolution is the birth control pill. Allowed women to become more independent. No wonder IB wants the govt to intervene in women's access to the pill. OUTLAW the pill

I never said outlaw the pill. I have said (and continue to say) End Women's Suffrage.

Men and women are not the same. And (at a subconcious level) these differences force each other to treat each other differently and to JUDGE the actions of the other different. Consider the following (and the following is NOT bullshit):

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/13/pr ... -learning/

A pregnant Arizona woman was arrested after allegedly running over her husband with her SUV upon discovering he did not vote in last week's election.

Police say 28-year-old Holly Solomon was enraged when she discovered her husband Daniel did not vote because she believes President Obama's re-election will bring hardship to their family, MyFoxPhoenix.com reports.

Witnesses say Daniel Solomon attempted hiding behind a light post to escape his wife's wrath and was running away when he was struck. He is now in critical condition at a local hospital.

Holly Solomon, who is six month pregnant, reportedly told officers she was only trying to scare her husband but accidentally hit the gas instead of the break.

She was arrested for domestic violence and aggravated assault.

They arrested her but I'll be surprised if she does much more than 6 months jail time (if any) and he's in critical condition. Now consider a man chasing his pregnant wife around a parking lot and running her over with his car for the same reason. What would be your reaction to that? Do you think the law would hold both genders equally responsible? I doubt it.

Owlman, would you care for me to give you a list of all the female high school teachers who have sexed their underage male students and have done NO jail time as a result? Again, flip it around (think about a male teacher fucking an underage girl) and your initial reaction to that. The genders are NOT the same and we do not hold their actions equally responsible.

Owlman, ask yourself this question: what makes a good man? What are the qualities that make a man a good man? This is not a trick question but it is a question that needs to be answered for you to understand the point I've been trying to make since November 6th.

[innocentbystander]

IB:

You didn't build that

I'm just tired of making excuses instead of talking about the real problem.

[Owlman]

See, here's the difference between you and me, IB. I know what it takes to be a good man and I don't need to denigrate women while understanding that point. You, imo, are a weak man. You seem to think being good or bad man has something to do with women, as though their actions effect whether the man is strong or not. You ignore facts to fit a pre-existing belief (one that is absolutely wrong). When they are pointed out to you, you then drop it for a time only to bring up those false beliefs later. Your sense of worth appears to be tied up in women, no self-worth at all. Thus, denigrate women, take away their rights so you can exert your superiority. If you truly felt you were superior, then you wouldn't advocate taking away their rights. Your intellect would be enough to sway. But deep down; way down, you know the truth.

You, IB, are a pathetic weak individual. You know you are intellectually simple so instead of engaging women on that front, you seek to deny them the same access as you. That's why you wish a life of 200 years ago, because you can't compete. Truly a sad example of mankind.

[innocentbystander]

See, here's the difference between you and me, IB. I know what it takes to be a good man and I don't need to denigrate women while understanding that point. You, imo, are a weak man. You seem to think being good or bad man has something to do with women, as though their actions effect whether the man is strong or not. You ignore facts to fit a pre-existing belief (one that is absolutely wrong). When they are pointed out to you, you then drop it for a time only to bring up those false beliefs later. Your sense of worth appears to be tied up in women, no self-worth at all. Thus, denigrate women, take away their rights so you can exert your superiority. If you truly felt you were superior, then you wouldn't advocate taking away their rights. Your intellect would be enough to sway. But deep down; way down, you know the truth.

You, IB, are a pathetic weak individual. You know you are intellectually simple so instead of engaging women on that front, you seek to deny them the same access as you. That's why you wish a life of 200 years ago, because you can't compete. Truly a sad example of mankind.

I'm not interested in what you perceive to be the differences between you and me. I'm not interested in comparing myself to you or to anyone. I'm not interested in how you incorrectly think I look at women. What I'm interested in, is an answer to my question. You didn't answer the question (as I knew you wouldn't, as I know you still WON'T.) So I'll ignore all your personal insults and repeat the question.

What are the qualities that make a man a good man?

[Johnette's Daddy]

THE PERFECT SOLUTION

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/whit ... ction.html

Looks like the Obama administration may have to respond to a petition seeking the green light for Texas to secede from the United States—one of 20 such requests filed on the official White House website since Election Day.

At the time of the writing of this post, the Texas secession petition had garnered 25,318 signatures—above the White House's self-imposed rules for requiring a reply.

(A "Recount the election!" petition filed Nov. 10 had 16,238 signatures. "Regulate Internet Pornography"? Not a big winner. It was filed Nov. 4 and had only 501 signatures.)

The White House may opt out of replying. Under its own rules, "To avoid the appearance of improper influence, the White House may decline to address certain procurement, law enforcement, adjudicatory, or similar matters properly within the jurisdiction of federal departments or agencies, federal courts, or state and local government in its response to a petition."

Other secession petitions include requests for Arkansas, South Carolina, Georgia, Missouri, Tennessee, Michigan, Colorado, Oregon, New Jersey, North Dakota, Montana, Indiana, Mississippi, Kentucky, North Carolina, Alabama and New York. (Spoiler alert: No, the White House won't approve secession.)

Here's the text of the Texas petition:


The U.S. continues to suffer economic difficulties stemming from the federal government's neglect to reform domestic and foreign spending. The citizens of the U.S. suffer from blatant abuses of their rights such as the NDAA, the TSA, etc. Given that the state of Texas maintains a balanced budget and is the 15th largest economy in the world, it is practically feasible for Texas to withdraw from the union, and to do so would protect its citizens' standard of living and re-secure their rights and liberties in accordance with the original ideas and beliefs of our founding fathers which are no longer being reflected by the federal government.

OK, Texas, get the FUCK out, and take Oklahoma with you!

But you'll have to send all of your black college football players to California, Florida and Ohio. Good luck in the BCS.

[THE_WIZARD_]

None of you fuckers can bring me down today...THE MCRIB IS BACK BABY!!!

[innocentbystander]

THE PERFECT SOLUTION

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/whit ... ction.html

Looks like the Obama administration may have to respond to a petition seeking the green light for Texas to secede from the United States—one of 20 such requests filed on the official White House website since Election Day.

At the time of the writing of this post, the Texas secession petition had garnered 25,318 signatures—above the White House's self-imposed rules for requiring a reply.

(A "Recount the election!" petition filed Nov. 10 had 16,238 signatures. "Regulate Internet Pornography"? Not a big winner. It was filed Nov. 4 and had only 501 signatures.)

The White House may opt out of replying. Under its own rules, "To avoid the appearance of improper influence, the White House may decline to address certain procurement, law enforcement, adjudicatory, or similar matters properly within the jurisdiction of federal departments or agencies, federal courts, or state and local government in its response to a petition."

Other secession petitions include requests for Arkansas, South Carolina, Georgia, Missouri, Tennessee, Michigan, Colorado, Oregon, New Jersey, North Dakota, Montana, Indiana, Mississippi, Kentucky, North Carolina, Alabama and New York. (Spoiler alert: No, the White House won't approve secession.)

Here's the text of the Texas petition:


The U.S. continues to suffer economic difficulties stemming from the federal government's neglect to reform domestic and foreign spending. The citizens of the U.S. suffer from blatant abuses of their rights such as the NDAA, the TSA, etc. Given that the state of Texas maintains a balanced budget and is the 15th largest economy in the world, it is practically feasible for Texas to withdraw from the union, and to do so would protect its citizens' standard of living and re-secure their rights and liberties in accordance with the original ideas and beliefs of our founding fathers which are no longer being reflected by the federal government.

OK, Texas, get the FUCK out, and take Oklahoma with you!

But you'll have to send all of your black college football players to California, Florida and Ohio. Good luck in the BCS.

Seriously?

We fought a war and buried (at that time) 2% of our total population to prevent states from withdrawing from the union. These are not serious filings and should not be taken seriously.

As it is, states are largely telling the Federal government that they can screw. Colorado broke Federal law and legalized Grass. So now, Eric Holder (or whoever takes his place) will have to decide if the Fed is going to prosecute Colorado residents for breaking Fed law in Colorado (a law that is no longer broken at the state level.) California has "sactuary cities" where illegals can live safely where they will not be prosecuted by California law enforcement, (it is up to the Feds.) I mean if states can do these things and the Fed has made political decisions to NOT do anything about it, then does it surprise you that 25,000 Texas dumbfucks petitioned the Fed with their signature to withdraw from the union?

[Jungle Rat]

I think what IB is telling us is that he likes to ride the bologna pony.

[Owlman]

The problem facing Republicans:

http://news.yahoo.com/interactive-polit ... 93498.html

[innocentbystander]

The problem facing Republicans:

http://news.yahoo.com/interactive-polit ... 93498.html

What are the qualities that make a man a good man?

[Owlman]

hah. a number of things. Ignoring most of what you advocate is high on the list.

[bluetick]

Poll: If Government Careens Off Fiscal Cliff, GOP to Shoulder Blame by Michael O'Brien, NBC News

Fifty-three percent of Americans said Republicans in Congress would be more to blame in that instance, according to a Pew Research Center poll conducted in the days following the election. Twenty-nine percent said that Obama would be more to blame, while 10 percent said both the president and Republicans would share blame.

[innocentbystander]

hah. a number of things. Ignoring most of what you advocate is high on the list.

I didn't give you a list. You have no idea what I am advocating. I am asking YOU to give me a list. This is not a trick question but I was correct (in my initial estimation) that you are functionally incapable of answering it. I shall repeat it.

What are the qualities that make a man a good man?