GBJs wrote:You'll notice I won't disagree with any of that. I agree we had been funding and covering. Which is why I said death for profit is bullshit. Or did you not want to quote that part. I'll tell ya what....you let me know which facts are relevent. Then no one will argue politics!
I guess I missed that... my bad, and my apology for the uncalled for insult. Below is your entire post, I must have missed it. Did you post it elsewhere?
This is the PNN, and I'm used to getting responses like the ignorant bullshit Prof Dumb Fuck writes.
You did say that we were already at war, how do you believe the issues you mentioned should have been addressed?
GBJs wrote:I don't post very often on this forum because arguing politics is usually futile. But I've got to call bullshit on that one.
Desert Storm should have been begun YEARS before. Because if you don't believe we were at war, you are absolutely, naive. The early 1980s attack on a Marine barracks, Embassy bombings attack on the USS Cole etc... are all things which should have been addressed.
We were already at war. It was simply now done by some of our rules.
Do I believe the war was necessary? Yes. Was it done properly? Fuck no. Go to war, go to win, go to come home.
Absolutely the last time we fought a war to win was WWII. Korea, Viet Nam, both of the Gulf wars were more about profit than winning. And for that, there is no reason for loss of life.