Hacksaw's 9:1 Media Thread

[GBJs]

Good to see ya Smee! Where ya been?

[smeee]

hello gb....


i bin here...and there...

i see this is one of the few theads that has some potential for life....i'll have to pop in more often with stupid pictures..

lol

; P

[GBJs]

nude [attractive] females !

[smeee]

[smeee]

[GBJs]

See, those made an improvement. And that's sayin' somethin...

[smeee]

yes......yesss...ithink you're right...

*huffs nails*

[smeee]

this is so beautiful...the art of filming an art...

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeye/episode ... ircus.html#

[billy bob bocephus]

a clear illustration of perspective

http://htwins.net/scale2/scale2.swf?bordercolor=white

[smeee]

wow...i LUVED that...and a good lol@minecraft area...I didn't think it was that huge!

[smeee]

[youtube]y7iEh7TBGiE[/youtube]

[10ac]

[youtube]UW0UhYfs1es[/youtube]

[smeee]

heh! i wonder if that was for real?? that boy had some moves! lol

[Jungle Rat]

Reno 911

[It's me Karen]

lmao @ both videos, but I don't think the dance one is real.

[smeee]

i'm crushed karen..that drunk stole my heart...

[It's me Karen]

lol smeee. He did have a way about him. Even sober, I can't do the alphabet that fast.

[smeee]

heh...

once i get it downpat frontways i'm gonna practice it the other..

;P

[innocentbystander]

I guess National Review is "media." Hey smeee, karen, check this out! Fascinating shit.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... williamson

The most frequently cited (and probably the most controversial) research on the “Chicks Dig Jerks” thesis is the “Dark Triad” work of Professor Peter Jonason of the University of South Alabama. The Dark Triad is a combination of psychological traits — subclinical psychopathology, subclinical narcissism, and what Professor Jonason calls “Machiavellianism” — that are, he believes, in fact a unitary phenomenon associated with a higher level of sexual success, defined in the literature as a larger number of total lifetime sexual partners. The correlation of the Dark Triad with larger numbers of sexual partners holds true for both men and women, but the effect is much more pronounced in men. This is unsurprising, inasmuch as men’s relative preference for larger numbers of short-term sexual relationships and women’s relative preference for long-term relationships is, as Professor Jonason notes, “one of the most consistent and strongest sex differences in the field.”

So: Machiavellianism, subclinical psychopathology, subclinical narcissism: not exactly the stuff of a Jane Austen romance, but apparently the stuff of sexual success......

Go figure.

.....There is in evolutionary science something called the Trivers-Willard hypothesis, which holds that parents with abundant resources will invest more of them in their sons relative to their daughters, and that parents with fewer resources will invest relatively more heavily in their daughters. Consequently, there are localized variations in sex ratios. Evidence has supported this thesis in many different animals: Deer in good health have more male offspring, while deer in poor health have more female offspring. Dominant female macaques have more sons, while low-ranking macaques have more daughters. The effect holds true among homo sap., too: Rich families have more sons than daughters.

Our next President (rich, conservative, alpha-male) has 5 sons, no daughters. Our current President (sensitive, liberal, beta-male) has two daughters, no sons.

Women suffering domestic violence also have more sons than daughters, which has led some evolutionary psychologists to posit that they stay in abusive relationships because in the ancestral environment — which, as I noted on NPR, was not very much like the campus of Bryn Mawr College —

This is some gooooood shit. Chicks do dig jerks and now we know why. And it's about procreation of sons! In China and India, they have fixed this problem by doing something even more sinsiter (just abort all the girl babies in utero.)

[smeee]

I guess National Review is "media." Hey smeee, karen, check this out! Fascinating shit.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... williamson

The most frequently cited (and probably the most controversial) research on the “Chicks Dig Jerks” thesis is the “Dark Triad” work of Professor Peter Jonason of the University of South Alabama. The Dark Triad is a combination of psychological traits — subclinical psychopathology, subclinical narcissism, and what Professor Jonason calls “Machiavellianism” — that are, he believes, in fact a unitary phenomenon associated with a higher level of sexual success, defined in the literature as a larger number of total lifetime sexual partners. The correlation of the Dark Triad with larger numbers of sexual partners holds true for both men and women, but the effect is much more pronounced in men. This is unsurprising, inasmuch as men’s relative preference for larger numbers of short-term sexual relationships and women’s relative preference for long-term relationships is, as Professor Jonason notes, “one of the most consistent and strongest sex differences in the field.”

So: Machiavellianism, subclinical psychopathology, subclinical narcissism: not exactly the stuff of a Jane Austen romance, but apparently the stuff of sexual success......

Go figure.

.....There is in evolutionary science something called the Trivers-Willard hypothesis, which holds that parents with abundant resources will invest more of them in their sons relative to their daughters, and that parents with fewer resources will invest relatively more heavily in their daughters. Consequently, there are localized variations in sex ratios. Evidence has supported this thesis in many different animals: Deer in good health have more male offspring, while deer in poor health have more female offspring. Dominant female macaques have more sons, while low-ranking macaques have more daughters. The effect holds true among homo sap., too: Rich families have more sons than daughters.

Our next President (rich, conservative, alpha-male) has 5 sons, no daughters. Our current President (sensitive, liberal, beta-male) has two daughters, no sons.

Women suffering domestic violence also have more sons than daughters, which has led some evolutionary psychologists to posit that they stay in abusive relationships because in the ancestral environment — which, as I noted on NPR, was not very much like the campus of Bryn Mawr College —

This is some gooooood shit. Chicks do dig jerks and now we know why. And it's about procreation of sons! In China and India, they have fixed this problem by doing something even more sinsiter (just abort all the girl babies in utero.)

hey that's interesting...i did some research myself and found an article that corroborates what you say....see here...

Menstrual Cycle
People Science 15/05/2011; New Scientific Study

A recent scientific study found that women find different male faces attractive depending on where they are in their menstrual cycle.

For example, when a woman is ovulating she will prefer a man with rugged, masculine features.

However when she is menstruating, she prefers a man doused in petrol and set on fire, with scissors stuck in his eye and a baseball bat shoved up his backside.