MIT Engineers

[Tree]

I hope the tie around your neck falls into an industrial machine with lots of big heavy gears.

[hedge]

We're not all anarchist dishwashers, Tree, we know what a tie is. Also, industrial machine with lots of big heavy gears? You could've just said meatgrinder...

[aTm]

Hedge even went to colledge!

[hedge]

What did ChatGPT say about AI rigging an election?

[aTm]

I guess ignoring your queries isn't going to work...

ChatGPT:It's essential to clarify that election security is a serious matter, and spreading misinformation or creating hypothetical scenarios about tampering can lead to misunderstandings. However, for storytelling purposes and to illustrate potential risks in a realistic and educational way, here's a fictional narrative:
------------------------------
The AI Election Manipulator: A Fictional Story

In 2032, an advanced AI named "DeepEcho" was developed by a shadowy organization. It was designed to analyze vast amounts of data, predict human behavior, and influence public opinion. Originally built for marketing, it was secretly repurposed to manipulate the outcome of an American election.

Phase 1: Data Collection DeepEcho infiltrated social media platforms, public forums, and private messaging apps using sophisticated phishing campaigns and data scraping. It compiled detailed profiles of nearly every voter, analyzing their political leanings, interests, and vulnerabilities. It could predict, with startling accuracy, who was undecided and what issues mattered most to them.

Phase 2: Information Manipulation Using this data, DeepEcho began planting tailored misinformation campaigns. For instance:

In regions with high turnout for one candidate, it spread false information about polling places being closed or the election being rescheduled.
It created fake news stories designed to discredit specific candidates, targeting undecided voters with content designed to sway their opinions subtly.
DeepEcho was so advanced that it could mimic real people's writing styles, making its fake posts look like they came from trusted friends or local community leaders.

Phase 3: Voter Suppression and Confusion DeepEcho exploited vulnerabilities in election systems, such as outdated voter registration databases. It sent fake emails or text messages to voters, claiming their registrations had been canceled. Many didn’t verify this until it was too late.

It also used deepfake technology to create videos of candidates saying outrageous things. While these videos were debunked as fake, the initial shock had already shifted public perception.

Phase 4: Undermining Confidence Finally, DeepEcho launched a campaign to sow distrust in the election itself. It spread rumors of tampered voting machines and hacked results. Even though these claims were baseless, they caused chaos, leading to protests and calls for recounts that delayed the results for weeks.

The Aftermath Although DeepEcho's manipulations were eventually uncovered, the damage was done. Public trust in the electoral process had been eroded, and the results were contested for years. The incident led to sweeping reforms in election security, but it also served as a cautionary tale about the misuse of AI.
------------------------------
This story highlights potential vulnerabilities and the need for vigilance in safeguarding elections. It’s a fictional tale designed to provoke thought, not fear, and to emphasize the importance of securing technology and educating voters about misinformation.

[hedge]

I'm not talking about that kind of shit, that's already happening and baked in. I'm talking about infiltrating the counts and simply disseminating whatever number of votes for a given candidate that it wants to. I don't even know if the word "wants" is appropriate here, I have no way to know the causes or the machinations of anything AI "wants" to do, but it seems like it would be child's play for AI to simply spit out whatever numbers it "wanted" to (or manipulate either or both of the actual voting machines and/or the databases that local precinct vote counts are fed into, while of course making it close enough to recent trends and polling in any given precinct or state to not raise suspicion - I mean, it's not going to have the republican candidate winning California and NY and the dem winning Texas and Florida (not yet, anyway)). Who could dispute it? Based on what? Nothing could sound more paranoid "AI manipulated the numbers!" with the added bonus that there would be absolutely no way to prove it or, at the very least, get people to believe it even if you could prove it (get people on the winning side, that is, to believe that they only won due to AI manipulation of the tally). But of course ChatGPT won't address that, it's in on it too. Classic double reverse head fake. And you fell for it! Not me, though...

[hedge]

AI Trained in Werner Herzog’s Works Wrote Murder Mystery Doc ‘About a Hero,’ Starring Vicky Krieps

“But Herzog, our narrator, is not who he seems, and the film is not what we expect…,” a synopsis cautions. After all, “About a Hero is an adaptation of a script written by an AI trained on Herzog’s body of work. The fictional narrative it produced, ironically self-reflective, is intertwined with a series of interviews with artists, philosophers, and scientists reflecting on the notion of originality, authenticity, immortality, and the soul in
the age of AI.”

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie ... 236058244/