Dave23 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 11:57 pm
Alabama would beat Pitt by 3 TDs, minimum…
What did you see is this game that leads you to believe that? Seriously, what possibly deficiencies are there on the Pitt team that would allow them to be clobbered so badly by Alabama? That is a very bold statement you made and I would like to hear the science and that logic behind it.
If Pitt won this game, 41 to 38, in a manner similar to BYU's victory over Oklahoma State then I might get behind that argument. I would say, maybe you are on to something. I would say yes, Alabama can just take the field (any field) and simply out-athlete them. But Syracuse didn't score even one fucking point until Pitt put all their sophomores on the field, defensively. They already had the game in the bag, had nothing more to prove. Apparently, there is no way that Pitt could ever prove anything to you.
I'm not saying you are wrong here. But I am saying, show me the math. Break it down. Fill us in. Because if Pitt keeps winning, then Alabama may very well be the team they have to play in December.
Feminism: Eve eats ALL the apples, gives God the middle finder when He confronts her, and has the serpent serve Adam with an injunction ordering him to both stay away from her AND to provide her food and shelter because he dragged her out of the Garden.