La Salle Explorers

[eCat]

I've quit trying to decide what is fake or not anymore. I"m just posting this

[sardis]

Pretty close to happening


https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as ... 3Dsharebar

[Jungle Rat]

Doh!

[Tree]

Ever been so high that pee coming out your dickhole feels good?

[hedge]

Rat has been a bad influence on you...

[Jungle Rat]

Non burning pee is my goal these days.

[eCat]

woman claims naked witches messing with dead deer in their backyard

https://www.foxla.com/news/scantily-cla ... am-footage

[Dave23]

Yep…looks that way to me…

[eCat]

I think the horse owner is fucking with grandpa

[eCat]

BOOOOOO

[Jungle Rat]

Gay

[Tree]

Let’s take a look at a big pot that features a very interesting play by Phil Ivey.

His opponent in the hand is poker enthusiast and casino owner Eric Persson.

It took place on a Hustler Casino Live show and the blinds were $200/$400/$800/$1,600 with a $400 Big Blind ante. The effective stack between the two is roughly $480,000.

Let’s jump in!

Preflop Action
Phil Ivey raises to $5,400 from the Button with . Eric Persson calls with [5h] from the straddle.

Preflop Analysis
Phil should be open-raising with a fairly wide range in this spot and Ace-Queen offsuit is clearly good enough. While there are still 4 players left to act, they are all out of position against Phil and there is a lot of dead money in the pot already. Raising with roughly the top 40% of hands is the most profitable strategy here.

Eric is getting a good price, only needing to realize about ~30% equity to make a profitable call. J5-suited has ~40% raw equity against a 45% open-raising range. This is much more than enough to make it a +EV (expected value) call.

Both players have played their hands well so far.

Flop Action
The flop comes [6c]. The pot is $12,600.

Eric checks. Phil checks.

Flop Analysis
Eric should check his entire range to the preflop raiser on this flop, as he does.

Phil has the stronger range on this board — he’s got more strong top pair and overpairs. Phil’s missed hands are also stronger than Eric’s — he can have hands like Ace-King, Ace-Queen, Ace-Ten suited, and King-Queen suited, all of which Eric should be 3-betting with preflop.

Phil should thus be c-betting very aggressively and with a small size on this type of board. This effect is exacerbated given that they are playing super deep. A small bet by Phil incentivizes Eric to check-raise with strong hands, which leaves Eric’s range more capped should he call.

is a great hand to bet small here, something like ~$4,000-$5,000. With two overcards, a backdoor nut flush draw, and a backdoor straight draw, it’s a powerhouse semi-bluff with a ton of playability.

Turn Action
The turn comes the , making the board . The pot is $12,600.

Eric probe bets $7,600. Phil calls.

Turn Analysis
The turn is one of the best possible outcomes for Eric. The hands with which Phil checks on the flop (mostly Ace-high and King-high hands) don’t improve often on this turn.

A 75% pot-sized bet works very well for Eric’s range. He is able to value bet with all of his top pairs and better. He can balance that value range by bluffing with flush draws, open-ended straight draws, and gutshot straight draws (with a smidge of overcard+flush draw blocker hands such as , , , , etc.).

Against this bet, Phil should call with , at least sometimes, because he is ahead of a large part of Eric’s range. Plus, he has equity against a good chunk of the value range with the two overcards to the top pair.

Well played by both players on the turn.

River Action
The river comes the , making the board . The pot is $27,800.

Eric overbets $29,600. Phil bluff-raises to $110,000. Eric snap-calls and gets shipped the $248,000 pot.

River Analysis
The river is an above-average one for Eric. A lot of his range now has just enough equity to extract value (hands like Jx) and those hands cannot bet big. Thus, he should implement a small bet strategy that contains both those thin value hands and stronger ones, such as:

Two pairs
Sets
Straights
Flushes (that protect the thin value bets)
Of course, this range would be balanced by an appropriate amount of bluffs (at equilibrium).

That being said, Eric chooses a small overbet for his flush, which is fine. It’s not an overplay, but it leaves holes in his overall strategy.

Phil’s decision to bluff-raise is flat-out wrong from a theoretical perspective. His blockers don’t work well for the range that he is targeting. He should be looking to do this with a heart in his hand.

That being said, it’s clear that Phil was attempting to make an exploitative move, expecting Eric to have a range of hands that would fold too often to his raise. Given that Phil is arguably the greatest player of all-time, it’s fair to assume he had a good reason for thinking this.

Eric has to call against this raise as it is simply too strong of a hand to fold, blocking many of Phil’s potential value hands.

Final Thoughts
Surprisingly, Eric Persson arguably played this hand better than the GOAT, Phil Ivey.

Does this mean that he is a better poker player than Phil? Well, let me ask you this: If a player dunked on Michael Jordan once, does that mean he’s a better player?

Of course, the answer is no. The same is true in poker. What matters is that the whole body of work (aka decisions) is superior to that of your opponents.

That’s all for this article! I hope you enjoyed it and that you learned from it! As usual, if you have any questions or feedback feel free to leave a comment in the section down below.

Till’ next time, good luck, grinders!

https://upswingpoker.com/ivey-vs-persso ... 39e05d2aef

[Jungle Rat]

Fuck off weirdo

[hedge]

"The flop comes [6c]."

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

[Tree]

Click the link, Oppenheimer.

[hedge]

Persson had that hand won with his pair of Jacks, he didn't need to flush...

[eCat]

a submarine that has a pilot, a content expert and 3 paying passengers who paid as much as $250K per seat to see the titanic up close has gone missing

Coast guard is involved but doesn't sound like a hopeful situation

[innocentbystander]

a submarine that has a pilot, a content expert and 3 paying passengers who paid as much as $250K per seat to see the titanic up close has gone missing

Coast guard is involved but doesn't sound like a hopeful situation

i read this. Possible tragedy. Unfortunately, because these are wealthier people who likely perished, I don't see this great outcry from the world saying how tragic this is.

jealousy

[eCat]

reading up on that sub - it is controlled steered by an xbox controller - not kidding and the passengers /crew are bolted into it from the outside.

They cannot get out of the thing until people unbolt the hinge.

Its like a 4th grader designed this thing

[Jungle Rat]

It got eaten by a giant octopus.