Florida State Seminoles

[Jungle Rat]

Sure looks and sounds like he's riddled with dementia. And not a single insult or name called. He's gotta go.

[innocentbystander]

Let’s cancel these cancel culture assholes!!! Oh wait…

Lets not. Lets argue with them.

[Tree]

Supposedly “independent” website Bellingcat raked in money from scandal-ridden Western intelligence firms that wreaked havoc – and reaped massive profits – in Syria.

They're part of the cast of characters that has been destabilizing Syria with propaganda efforts, especially including the fake chemical weapons attacks attributed to the Syrian government.

https://thegrayzone.com/2021/10/09/bell ... sts-syria/

[Tree]

Let’s cancel these cancel culture assholes!!! Oh wait…

Lets not. Lets argue with them.

Who is behind cancel culture though? Is there some shadowy cabal of powerful SJW's pulling all the strings?

[innocentbystander]

Let’s cancel these cancel culture assholes!!! Oh wait…

Lets not. Lets argue with them.

Who is behind cancel culture though? Is there some shadowy cabal of powerful SJW's pulling all the strings?

The right wants to argue and change minds by debate.

The left thinks logic and debate is "white male supremacy." The left just wants to take the earning power away from everyone that disagrees with them while at the same time, retaining all authority to set law and policy. That is ALL that this Merrick Garland and the parents cursing school board members which (in turn) gets the parents investigated as domestic terrorists by the federal government nonsense, is about.

Which of these do you think is the better solution? Its not a hard question tree.

Hell even the person who set the policy in motion is having a hard time defending it. Garland's lower lip is trembling and you can see, he is about ready to start crying.



Its like, leave me alone, I'm an old man. Stop picking on me, I'm your elder, just do what do what I tell you to do! That seems to be Garland's defense for the insanity that he has proposed.

That is the left tree.

[DooKSucks]

The right wants to argue and change minds by debate.

The left thinks logic and debate is "white male supremacy." The left just wants to take the earning power away from everyone that disagrees with them while at the same time, retaining all authority to set law and policy. That is ALL that this Merrick Garland and the parents cursing school board members which (in turn) gets the parents investigated as domestic terrorists by the federal government nonsense, is about.

Which of these do you think is the better solution? Its not a hard question tree.

Hell even the person who set the policy in motion is having a hard time defending it. Garland's lower lip is trembling and you can see, he is about ready to start crying.



Its like, leave me alone, I'm an old man. Stop picking on me, I'm your elder, just do what do what I tell you to do! That seems to be Garland's defense for the insanity that he has proposed.

That is the left tree.

You are one incredibly stupid son of a bitch if you actually believe that garbage. The right started this cancel shit with the religious right going around trying to cancel anything they deemed out of line with their ideology.

Go fuck yourself, you racist cocksucker.

[innocentbystander]

And tree, before you start and say that both sides so this, NO THEY DO NOT. When the left attacks directors on the right put into positions of authority, its never about law and order. Its never about common sense. Its about politics. Its about pulling at your heart strings. Its about reframing and obfuscating. But you know what....



...when you are dealing from a position of the law and rightousness, its real easy to push back at the left and embarrass them when they ask pointless questions. You answer their question directly and then refer to the law.

[innocentbystander]

The right wants to argue and change minds by debate.

The left thinks logic and debate is "white male supremacy." The left just wants to take the earning power away from everyone that disagrees with them while at the same time, retaining all authority to set law and policy. That is ALL that this Merrick Garland and the parents cursing school board members which (in turn) gets the parents investigated as domestic terrorists by the federal government nonsense, is about.

Which of these do you think is the better solution? Its not a hard question tree.

Hell even the person who set the policy in motion is having a hard time defending it. Garland's lower lip is trembling and you can see, he is about ready to start crying.



Its like, leave me alone, I'm an old man. Stop picking on me, I'm your elder, just do what do what I tell you to do! That seems to be Garland's defense for the insanity that he has proposed.

That is the left tree.

You are one incredibly stupid son of a bitch if you actually believe that garbage. The right started this cancel shit with the religious right going around trying to cancel anything they deemed out of line with their ideology.

Go fuck yourself, you racist cocksucker.

The religious right? You mean me?

If so then Yes, I want to change the law on no-fault-divorce and take away YOUR earning power. You bet. You are damn straight. You see YOU ARE A DESTROYER and I am good man who believes in marriage. You just profit from wrecking marriages and destroying homes and encouraging children in those broken homes to overdose on drugs or even to commit suicide. That is your profession DS. And I am calling you out on it. You are the worst of all possible home-wreckers.

But religious leader? Church leaders? They have no power to take away someone's job or earning power. They just shame. They just want to save souls. You want to burn them. Once again, that makes all of them better people than you.

And as far racism goes, my way, more black people and more Hispanic people will get and stay married. Your way (profit from ending marriage) blacks no longer marry at all (76% of their kids are born as bastards) and Hispanics rarely marry (they have a 56% bastardy rate.) I don't think either one of us is racist, but your actions seem awfully racist to me (just white and Asian people getting married with no-fault-divorce law.)

Re-examine your life counsellor.

[DooKSucks]

Listen you dumb, incel cocksucker: if you are to fucking stupid to understand that the right is attempting to "cancel" in an effort to appeal to the emotions of white folks and bigots, you're so damn stupid you should close the doors to your garage, start the car and sit there until you fall asleep.

[innocentbystander]

Listen you dumb, incel cocksucker: if you are to fucking stupid to understand that the right is attempting to "cancel" in an effort to appeal to the emotions of white folks and bigots, you're so damn stupid you should close the doors to your garage, start the car and sit there until you fall asleep.

You are not naming anything. You are not defining anything that is absolute. Everything is just rhetoric to you. You have named not one example of anything. Nothing.

I give examples. I give data. I give math. We can debate those things.

You give us nothing but rhetoric. And insults. You give us those as well. What you do, you shut down debate because you don't give us anything to debate.

My way is better. Your way is a damn used car sales pitch. I would rather you go and sell timesharing than break up another marriage.

[DooKSucks]

I am sure you have been stupid enough to buy timeshares.

[innocentbystander]

I am sure you have been stupid enough to buy timeshares.

I did!

I bought one week (wholesale) in 1992. I sold my week for a PROFIT in 2003. I made money whereas every other timeshare owner generally loses it.

You know what a "wholesale" timeshare week is DS? If you don't, then you better not march down this path because I'll crush you here too. And you know it.

I've got you counsellor. I've got you. How embarrassing and humiliating it must be for you to know that there is no safe discussion you can open up with me where you can know for any certainty that you will know more than me? Maybe you should insult me more if that gives your pride a hard on?

[Jungle Rat]

We all remember what Republicans think debating is.

[Jungle Rat]

And making a profit after 11 years on a time share?

BAHAHAHA!

[innocentbystander]

We all remember what Republicans think debating is.

Mr Vice President, where is your son Hunter? Why did you blackmail the nation of Ukraine into NOT investigating Hunter being on the board at Burisma at $80,000 a month salary (to do nothing) by threatening to not give Ukraine military hardware to defend themselves against Russia if they kept investigating him?

Ah come on man!

[innocentbystander]

And making a profit after 11 years on a time share?

BAHAHAHA!

$500!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I MADE $500 by selling what I owned to someone else. Private sale. And you know why?

Because I paid a wholesale price when I bought it. I didn't pay retail.

[DooKSucks]

I am sure you have been stupid enough to buy timeshares.

I did!

I bought one week (wholesale) in 1992. I sold my week for a PROFIT in 2003. I made money whereas every other timeshare owner generally loses it.

You know what a "wholesale" timeshare week is DS? If you don't, then you better not march down this path because I'll crush you here too. And you know it.

I've got you counsellor. I've got you. How embarrassing and humiliating it must be for you to know that there is no safe discussion you can open up with me where you can know for any certainty that you will know more than me? Maybe you should insult me more if that gives your pride a hard on?

IT nerds are a funny lot.

Shouldn't you be writing about some twink drowning in the sweat from the skin folds of a 375 lb middle aged wench?

[Tree]

Vintage IB. Asks what he thinks are questions but are really not so cleverly packaged statements, (not to mention faulty ones). Then goes on to post an AOC video on immigration in a discussion about cancel culture.

[innocentbystander]

I am sure you have been stupid enough to buy timeshares.

I did!

I bought one week (wholesale) in 1992. I sold my week for a PROFIT in 2003. I made money whereas every other timeshare owner generally loses it.

You know what a "wholesale" timeshare week is DS? If you don't, then you better not march down this path because I'll crush you here too. And you know it.

I've got you counsellor. I've got you. How embarrassing and humiliating it must be for you to know that there is no safe discussion you can open up with me where you can know for any certainty that you will know more than me? Maybe you should insult me more if that gives your pride a hard on?

IT nerds are a funny lot.

Shouldn't you be writing about some twink drowning in the sweat from the skin folds of a 375 lb middle aged wench?

Later tonight counsellor.

I am just mentioning right now that it is the left that is behind cancel culture. I was educating tree. You appear to be beyond hope of re-education. You are so brainwashed your brain is gone. You lack the capacity to even think now. That is why you have to be a home wrecker instead of a legitimate attorney. If you didn't have no-fault-divorce as a state law, you wouldn't know what to do to make money in a court room.

If you had any examples of the right taking away the earning power of the left for what they said, you would have mentioned them. You don't. Its just rhetoric to you. And we both know that if you mention any example (any little thing) I will do my research and blow you out of the water. So you insult me instead.

[Jungle Rat]

A whopping $50 a year profit! You are amazing!