https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/10/ ... term=first
Took my daughter down to Tucson yesterday. We spent the entire day roaming around the campus of the University of Arizona. (She has been accepted and has a full-ride scholarship, tuition only.) What I found striking is that I saw basically, just young women. That was it. Young women everywhere. The few young men that were there walking around, they were all gay.Sullivan wrote:The relative obsolescence of men does create headline figures that some would welcome. Male and female employment rates do converge. And it should be noted that among the 10 percent of Americans most exposed to automation, the employment-to-population ratio is still higher for men than women. But the employment-to-population-rate disparity between men and women is a whopping 31.4 percent lower than it is among the 10 percent least exposed. There are other consolations from the new employment landscape: In collecting fewer paychecks, for instance, men are less likely to run up bar tabs and make their way into the driver’s seat. Per capita rates of drunk driving, a crime perpetrated by men 80 percent of the time, are 26.3 percent lower among those most exposed to automation. This suggests that the effects of automation may complicate the well-documented tendency of lower rates of employment to, historically, raise local rates of alcohol abuse and other substance abuse.
But this is no happy tale. When marriages are formed, they tend fall apart more frequently. Rates of divorce are 19.1 percent higher among the 10 percent most exposed to automation than among the 10 percent least exposed. Sex crimes, per capita, are a whopping 98 percent higher. Some crimes may grow less frequent, but crime as a whole does not. The per capita rate of crime overall among the most exposed is 65.7 percent higher.
What I hope is the case is that there are normal heterosexual males at the University of Arizona, but that they were all still sleeping all day Saturday after drinking all night Friday night.
