Florida State Seminoles

[Jungle Rat]

Famous?

[DooKSucks]

"They'll deliver on a promise even if it means short term loss to the company"

What kind of promise? On another note, I've heard that the Costco brand of scotch isn't bad...

I have had some of the blended but not the single malt. I'm a single malt person but will drink blended in a pinch, and the Kirkland blended scotch wasn't horrible.

Still, I doubt Kirklands will be producing anything that will replace my Speyside regulars of Glenlivet and Macallan or the Oban I drink when I want to mix it up.

[Jungle Rat]

You monster

[DooKSucks]

You monster

IB, is that you?

[Jungle Rat]

I think he's dead

[DooKSucks]

First it was Jonquil followed quickly by Crow, then you got CMac, De Gaulle, Mook and the other guy who went to Xavier, Onion and now IB. How many posters have you stalked and murdered?

[Jungle Rat]

I lost count.

[hedge]

"I have had some of the blended but not the single malt. I'm a single malt person but will drink blended in a pinch, and the Kirkland blended scotch wasn't horrible."

I don't mind a blended scotch, but I usually find myself reaching for a single malt when I do drink it. I prefer the Islay scotches: Bowmore, Ardbeg, Laphroaig, and, by far my favorites, Bruichladdich and Lagavulin. In fact, I think I'll have a dram of Lagavulin right now. It never disappoints...

[innocentbystander]

I think he's dead

you wish

[Jungle Rat]

Dammit

[DooKSucks]

Rat, you’re getting rusty in old age. You didn’t hit the heart and slit the throat all the way, and he survived. I expect better of you….

[Jungle Rat]

I have a soft spot for retards.

[DooKSucks]

I have a soft spot for retards.

If that’s the case, why did you murder Mook and Onion?

[Jungle Rat]

Mook was ugly and Onion had many other issues.

[hedge]

https://www.rawstory.com/john-durham-in ... on-emails/

Emails unearthed by the New York Times undercut a key allegation made by John Durham, the prosecutor appointed by former Attorney General Bill Barr to investigate the FBI's 2016 probe of the Trump campaign.

Specifically, the indictment alleged that former Hillary Clinton attorney Michael Sussman alerted the FBI to allegedly suspicious computer traffic between a Trump Tower server and a server connected to a Russian bank despite the fact that the people who uncovered the traffic did not think it was anything nefarious.

However, the Times report shows that emails between the researchers suggest that they took the possibility of Trump officials having back-channel communications with the Russian bank very seriously at the time of their investigation.

"In the narrow scope of what you have defined above, I agree wholeheartedly that it is plausible," wrote the researcher. "If the white paper intends to say that there are communications between at least Alfa and Trump, which are being intentionally hidden by Alfa and Trump I absolutely believe that is the case."

Another example comes from an email written by David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who was one of the researchers investigating the server traffic.

"The indictment also suggests Mr. Dagon's support for the paper's hypothesis was qualified, describing his email response as 'acknowledging that questions remained, but stating, in substance and in part, that the paper should be shared with government officials,'" writes the Times. "The text of that email shows Mr. Dagon was forcefully supportive. He proposed editing the paper to declare as 'fact' that it was clear 'that there are hidden communications between Trump and Alfa Bank,' and said he believed the findings met the probable cause standard to open a criminal investigation."

[innocentbystander]

https://www.rawstory.com/john-durham-in ... on-emails/

Emails unearthed by the New York Times undercut a key allegation made by John Durham, the prosecutor appointed by former Attorney General Bill Barr to investigate the FBI's 2016 probe of the Trump campaign.

Specifically, the indictment alleged that former Hillary Clinton attorney Michael Sussman alerted the FBI to allegedly suspicious computer traffic between a Trump Tower server and a server connected to a Russian bank despite the fact that the people who uncovered the traffic did not think it was anything nefarious.

However, the Times report shows that emails between the researchers suggest that they took the possibility of Trump officials having back-channel communications with the Russian bank very seriously at the time of their investigation.

"In the narrow scope of what you have defined above, I agree wholeheartedly that it is plausible," wrote the researcher. "If the white paper intends to say that there are communications between at least Alfa and Trump, which are being intentionally hidden by Alfa and Trump I absolutely believe that is the case."

Another example comes from an email written by David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who was one of the researchers investigating the server traffic.

"The indictment also suggests Mr. Dagon's support for the paper's hypothesis was qualified, describing his email response as 'acknowledging that questions remained, but stating, in substance and in part, that the paper should be shared with government officials,'" writes the Times. "The text of that email shows Mr. Dagon was forcefully supportive. He proposed editing the paper to declare as 'fact' that it was clear 'that there are hidden communications between Trump and Alfa Bank,' and said he believed the findings met the probable cause standard to open a criminal investigation."

hedge we already know that a lawyer by the name of Clinesmith lied to a judge to get the court order to tap the phones of Carter Page.

https://apnews.com/article/election-202 ... 70d66cefec

that happened. It is not in dispute. Everything you wrote, all noise.

Why can't you just admit that the Russia collusion nonsense was all a ruse just the way POTUS Trump said it was? It was all a ruse. Trump was proven correct. He never tried to stop the investigation because he knew, in the end, he would be exonerated. But that isn't good enough for you because for you, politics is more important than facts and reality. I certainly hope you didn't feel that way when you were convicted of whatever felony you got

[Jungle Rat]

"But that isn't good enough for you because for you, politics is more important than facts and reality. "

WTF?

[hedge]

" I certainly hope you didn't feel that way when you were convicted of whatever felony you got"

I wish what I had been convicted of was homicide. Yours...

[Jungle Rat]

Lighter sentence

[eCat]