That is not what I said DS and you know it.
I said that if a private entity that you use for speech (one that you didn't even pay to use, I might add) chooses to simply remove your speech from their portal (perhaps because the forum administrator reading what you wrote is a vestal-virgin-millenial fainting at such abusive comments that they didn't think they would ever have to read, anywhere, especially in their "safe space"), then so be it. But maybe it is time to find ANOTHER portal where that wont happen? That is why conservatives who are all about self regulation, personal responsibility, no government interference, private enterprise being supreme are leaving Facebook and Twitter and going to Parler. I don't blame them. But Parler needs to NOT go cheap and NOT use AWS for their portal hosting. They need to host their IP themselves so that Bezos can't simply "turn them off" because of the politics of Parler.
Facebook is only worth a couple hundred billion dollars because so many use it. Networking effects. The people stop using it (or in my case, I never used it) then its value starts to decline. If Bezos and Zuckerberg want to empower their millenials to remove speech based on nothing other than politics, that's fine with me. But the overall collective value of those portals declines the less they are used. So it just hurts them in the wallet the more they regulate themselves.