Florida State Seminoles

[Jungle Rat]

The dude is a freaking mess. Wow.

[Professor Tiger]

How do you suppose this insane wackjob nutcase deranged President keeps running circles around all the supposedly smart intelligent educated sophisticated people with high SAT scores and Ivy League degrees?

[DooKSucks]

How do you suppose this insane wackjob nutcase deranged President keeps running circles around all the supposedly smart intelligent educated sophisticated people with high SAT scores and Ivy League degrees?

He is a carnival barker who attracts cretins like a pied piper

[eCat]

The bump stock ban along the same lines of the high capacity magazine.....


In one of the strongest judicial statements in favor of the Second Amendment to date, Judge Roger T. Benitez of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California determined on Friday that California’s ban on commonly possessed firearm magazines violates the Second Amendment.

The case is Duncan v. Becerra.

The NRA-supported case had already been up to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the question of whether the law’s enforcement should be suspended during proceedings on its constitutionality. Last July, a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit upheld Judge Benitez’s suspension of enforcement and sent the case back to him for further proceedings on the merits of the law itself.

Judge Benitez rendered his opinion late Friday afternoon and handed Second Amendment supporters a sweeping victory by completely invalidating California’s 10-round limit on magazine capacity. “Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts,” he declared.

In a scholarly and comprehensive opinion, Judge Benitez subjected the ban both to the constitutional analysis he argued was required by the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller and a more complicated and flexible test the Ninth Circuit has applied in prior Second Amendment cases.

Either way, Judge Benitez ruled, the law would fail. Indeed, he characterized the California law as “turning the Constitution upside down.” He also systematically dismantled each of the state’s purported justifications for the law, demonstrating the factual and legal inconsistencies of their claims.

Unfortunately, Friday’s opinion is not likely to be the last word on the case. The state will likely appeal to the Ninth Circuit, which has proven notably hostile to the Second Amendment in past decisions.

[Jungle Rat]

And so go the days of our lives.....

[Professor Tiger]

How do you suppose this insane wackjob nutcase deranged President keeps running circles around all the supposedly smart intelligent educated sophisticated people with high SAT scores and Ivy League degrees?

He is a carnival barker who attracts cretins like a pied piper

Here are the latest pearls of wisdom by the #1 intellectual leader of the smart, educated, sophisticated, mentally superior people:

“They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure Roosevelt did not get re-elected,” the New York Democrat said during an MSNBC town hall on Friday night, as she touted the positive effects of the New Deal.

As one of those supposedly smart, intelligent, educated, sophisticated, people (not to mention a lawyer, who is therefore held to higher standards), you ARE aware that the 22nd Amendment, which limited POTUS to two terms, was passed in March 1947. Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945. You ARE aware of that, right?

[hedge]

The only thing you need to pay attention to is that the Constitution can be amended. It's not the 10 commandments...

[DooKSucks]

How do you suppose this insane wackjob nutcase deranged President keeps running circles around all the supposedly smart intelligent educated sophisticated people with high SAT scores and Ivy League degrees?

He is a carnival barker who attracts cretins like a pied piper

Here are the latest pearls of wisdom by the #1 intellectual leader of the smart, educated, sophisticated, mentally superior people:

“They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure Roosevelt did not get re-elected,” the New York Democrat said during an MSNBC town hall on Friday night, as she touted the positive effects of the New Deal.

As one of those supposedly smart, intelligent, educated, sophisticated, people (not to mention a lawyer, who is therefore held to higher standards), you ARE aware that the 22nd Amendment, which limited POTUS to two terms, was passed in March 1947. Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945. You ARE aware of that, right?

The 22nd was passed in response to Roosevelt, and it was initiated by the new Republican Congress in 1947.

[Jungle Rat]

DS with a slapshot save.

[10ac]

Yeah, that kept him from being re-elected.

[sardis]

He is a carnival barker who attracts cretins like a pied piper[/quote]

Here are the latest pearls of wisdom by the #1 intellectual leader of the smart, educated, sophisticated, mentally superior people:

“They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure Roosevelt did not get re-elected,” the New York Democrat said during an MSNBC town hall on Friday night, as she touted the positive effects of the New Deal.

As one of those supposedly smart, intelligent, educated, sophisticated, people (not to mention a lawyer, who is therefore held to higher standards), you ARE aware that the 22nd Amendment, which limited POTUS to two terms, was passed in March 1947. Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945. You ARE aware of that, right?[/quote]

The 22nd was passed in response to Roosevelt, and it was initiated by the new Republican Congress in 1947.[/quote]

Couldn’t have been made an amendment unless there was bipartisan support and support by a super majority of states. Couldn’t happen with just Republicans.

[DooKSucks]

Correct. Plenty of Democrats despised FDR after the court packing plan in ‘37 and his meddling in the ‘38 primaries. In fact, his domestic agenda was essentially dead after the ‘38 midterms. Foreign policy concerns kept him in office.

Heck, his VP, Garner, ran against him in the ‘40 primary/convention cycle as a protest (presidential primaries didn’t become important until ‘60).

[eCat]

there are some democrats now (Warren being one) that wants to expand the number of SCOTUS so they can stack it with progressives while they are in power.

They also want to trash the electoral college and lower the voting age to 16 (while also raising the age to buy a gun to 21)

all because Hillary lost.


Hillary........

[Jungle Rat]

Do you believe everything you read on the internet?

[hedge]

Are you insinuating that your pee doesn't smell like ham??

[Jungle Rat]

Heh. That line will live forever.

[Jungle Rat]

Why does Trump hate the millions of Americans that live in Puerto Rico? Our 51st. state. Is it because he lost the primary to Rubio? To bad they are American citizens yet Can't vote. It's ashame how he is fucking those people. Had 3000 died in a state he won that stupid racist fuck would be shitting golden eggs to help. Dumb as a fucking rock.

Oh, you know it's gonna happen.

[eCat]

Why does Trump hate the millions of Americans that live in Puerto Rico? Our 51st. state. Is it because he lost the primary to Rubio? To bad they are American citizens yet Can't vote. It's ashame how he is fucking those people. Had 3000 died in a state he won that stupid racist fuck would be shitting golden eggs to help. Dumb as a fucking rock.

Oh, you know it's gonna happen.

fuck Puerto Rico - they have 4 voted times to reject statehood

[aTm]

Agree. Puerto Rico chose to be a US colony repeatedly, over both independence and statehood. They need to be told that status quo is not an option anymore and to decide.

[Jungle Rat]

Why does Trump hate the millions of Americans that live in Puerto Rico? Our 51st. state. Is it because he lost the primary to Rubio? To bad they are American citizens yet Can't vote. It's ashame how he is fucking those people. Had 3000 died in a state he won that stupid racist fuck would be shitting golden eggs to help. Dumb as a fucking rock.

Oh, you know it's gonna happen.

fuck Puerto Rico - they have 4 voted times to reject statehood

Considering how we've treated them who can blame them.