Translation:hedge wrote:So Toe says "Cohen publicly confirms Mueller has nothing on collusion", and Rat replies that Cohen never admitted that. Then Prof, like the flailing little faggot that he is, comes in and stomps his little feet and offers this as a rebuttal to Rat: ""Questions have been raised about whether I know of direct evidence that Mr. Trump or his campaign colluded with Russia. I do not. I want to be clear. But, I have my suspicions," Cohen said."
How can anybody put a full-blown idiot and Trump knob-gobbler conceive that Cohen admitting that he himself does not have direct evidence of Russian collusion is therefor proof that it didn't happen and that Mueller has nothing? That that equates to Cohen "confirming Mueller has nothing on collusion"?? Even if it didn't happen, there's no way that anybody but a fucking moron like Prof could think that Cohen admitting he has no direct knowledge about it (although he goes on to say he suspects Trump did) is confirmation that Mueller has nothing, which was the original claim that Rat disputed...
1. Cohen hasn’t got anything on Trump.
2. Manafort hasn’t got anything on Trump, no matter how many times Mueller has him water boarded.
3. Flynn hasn’t got anything on Trump.
4. The Coffee Boy hasn’t got anything on Trump.
5. Pencil Neck Schiff hasn’t got anything on Trump.
6. Finally, most importantly, and I can’t stress this enough, MUELLER HASN’T GOT ANYTHING ON TRUMP. Deal with it, soy boy hedge.