Moderators: The Talent, Hacksaw, bluetick, puterbac, 10ac
:::smh::: New Republic and NYPost reviewers panning the series...too morose, too one-sided (guess which side), too defeatist. Not enough verve or esprit de corps...hey, we were on a mission for good. Even the music gets a failing grade (too trippy).Professor Tiger wrote:As a big fan of Will and Burns, I saw the first episode. It was superb.
Once they built the new engineering building we moved to between G10 and Tboling. If you are on the pedestrian bridge connecting top of g10 and tboling and look down towards Fulmer Way we are setup along the wall that runs out from the east side ramp of tboling to the street right next to the street. Still have tallest flag pole (25') with USA, Trump MAGA, Don't Tread on me, than UT and tomorrow UT will be flown upside down as we are in distress.bluetick wrote:We were in the media lot the last 30 seasons but the new AD sent us and several others packing. We're now at the Music Building (G-25 or some bs) and it's not the same. It was a tailgate per se...out on the asphalt with all the unwashed.puterbac wrote:Tick,
Still tailgating? Saturday was a lot busier than I thought it would be. Good weather, late afternoon, and home opener will do that I guess.
You still doing shots and live entertainment at G-10?
We aren't and we won't be until Butch is fired. He's Mr 8-4/9-3 and melts under pressure in a game.hedge wrote:" puter understands this, because this is about big-time cfb. Your lack of clarity on the subject is certainly understandable."
Wow, I haven't heard anyone refer to Tennessee as being about big time cfb in years. You have more losing seasons than winning ones in the past decade, and a couple of those "winning seasons" were 7-6. And you lost to UNC in a bowl game what amounted to a home game for UT. Big time cfb!
I didn't watch a single play of the home opener. I stay at tailgate, but float like the social butterfly I am and talk all the girls who love me because they know I can't bang them.DooKSucks wrote:So, 100,000 people funnel into Knoxville from the surrounding hills and hollers to spend thousands of dollars each year watching subpar football? Sounds like an intelligent group of folks...
Yep.puterbac wrote: We aren't and we won't be until Butch is fired. He's Mr 8-4/9-3 and melts under pressure in a game.
Well, he'll always have the Tech game. Nobody can take that away from him.We aren't and we won't be until Butch is fired. He's Mr 8-4/9-3 and melts under pressure in a game.
Of course, it wouldn't be "climate science" without some tinkering with the data to hide the truth:Call it another dispute about the “settled science” of climate change.
According to a report published in Nature Geosciences last week, we have more time than we thought to stop the predicted meltdown of the planet. Not only are climate models way off—“running hot” by overestimating temperature increases—but the warming we were supposed to experience this century hasn’t happened as most climate models anticipated. What’s even more alarming to the climate tribe is that this study, “Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 [degrees Celsius],” is authored by several prominent climate scientists,, many of whom have warned of planetary doom if we don’t cap global warming within the 1.5 C range.
Someone may have told Hausfather that his chart wasn’t exactly helping the cause, so he created another chart 12 hours later to show a more garbled version of climate models vs. observed temps...
Hausfather changed the Y-axis in order to show much less discrepancy between the range of climate model projections and temperatures. The first graph has a range of 1.5 C and the second has a range of 4 C. (When I asked him why he changed it, he said it was a “simplified” version of the first graph.) He also extended the timeline from 2020 to 2100 in an effort to justify the Y-axis change, even though the longer timeline is irrelevant to the Nature paper.
https://amgreatness.com/2017/09/23/more ... te-change/
It's looking like 8-4 would be considered wildly successful this year in Knoxville...puterbac wrote:We aren't and we won't be until Butch is fired. He's Mr 8-4/9-3 and melts under pressure in a game.hedge wrote:" puter understands this, because this is about big-time cfb. Your lack of clarity on the subject is certainly understandable."
Wow, I haven't heard anyone refer to Tennessee as being about big time cfb in years. You have more losing seasons than winning ones in the past decade, and a couple of those "winning seasons" were 7-6. And you lost to UNC in a bowl game what amounted to a home game for UT. Big time cfb!
Your team is 1-4 and just got whacked by a team we beat. Nobody in Chapel Hill really cares. We otoh are on suicide watch at 3-2. Therein lies the point.hedge wrote:
It's looking like 8-4 would be considered wildly successful this year in Knoxville...
I'd say no. There are 2 teams in the history of cfb who've never failed to win 5 games in a season...us and tOSU. Seems like we've always played at least 6 conference games a year....10ac wrote:Has UT ever gone a complete season without beating an SEC foe?
