AlabamAlum wrote:After the 1992 season. January 1993.
dayum
that's like ancient
I'm starting to sound like Crotch
Moderators: eCat, hedge, Cletus
AlabamAlum wrote:After the 1992 season. January 1993.
Saint wrote:Hurts had a 68-yd TD toss. How often do you get that from Alabama's offense. The bottom line is that the defense gave up 35 points but the Tide didn't run the ball when they needed to run it and then they didn't really pass the ball well either. Maybe it was playcalling, maybe it was the freshman QB who led them to 13 straight wins. Maybe Clemson just played the perfect game. If the TE doesn't make that incredible catch, they have to kick a long FG just to tie it. If the kick isn't returned to near midfield, Clemson probably wouldn't have scored a TD on its final drive. Lots of ifs but you're right when you say that Alabama will be back in it next year and every year that Saban coaches before he inevitably keels over with an aneurysm.
Except Clemson did it a lot better once Scarbrough was out of the game. True, he did have less ypc than the other 2 you mentioned but he always carried the ball more. I wonder why Sark didn't design more run plays for Hurts. He was pretty good on that scramble TD, which seemed like another busted play.AlabamAlum wrote: The 68-yard toss was a busted play. It happens pretty often. We had a ton of long plays this year. He led us to 14 straight wins (not 13), but the Clemson plan was to make him pass and they did that. He was 13 of 31 (.419) for 131 yards, he was a .650 QB through those 14 wins. He had a bad night. And, as you note, 68 of those 131 total yards he had came on one busted coverage. Would we have been better served by not even passing at all? Sure. Maybe.