my point is the doctors/nurses have shown they are incapable of caring for the ebola patients without a much higher risk of contracting the disease.
Yes. You come in contact with body fluids of someone who is deathly ill or dead from Ebola you are at a higher risk of contracting the disease. Other than eating an infected bat or chimp, it's about the only way to get the disease.
Now if there is a test that shows you don't have it, fine - then go on about your day and do whatever you want - however if the test just shows you don't have it *now* and its still possible that in 10 or 12 days you could get a fever ( and I understand that even then you aren't contagious) then I'm going to support a 21 day quarantine - so that you don't take the train to a meatball shop and go bowling , or go get take out food, or get on a plane to go dress shopping in Cleveland.
The test only shows a negative viral load now. It is possible that it will develop later. Why 21 days? While 21 days of isolation is the accepted recommendation. so is at-home monitoring. Why one and not the other? Let's not trust the WHO on anything!
Of the plane ride, and the bowling alley, and the jogging and meatball subs shops and whatever, thousands of citizens came in contact with the various healthcare providers, how many of those thousands have contracted Ebola in the public? Ebola has been going on for years in Africa and we've been sending people over there and back. This latest foray of coverage is hysteria fueled by Fox News and CNN. Remember, We've had more Americans die from Killer Bee attacks this month.
If am a medical professional treating a contagious disease - especially one that is wiping out people left and right in West Africa, do I really need to contact the WHO or CDC to determine the level of protection and appropriate measure to insure I don't contract the disease?
The infection control team of a hospital in the US follows the CDC rec. the average team member doesn't get to pick and choose which suit is provided.
so yes, the quarantine is to protect the public at large - from doctors/nurses who are returning from West Africa and may not have taken the necessary precautions to prevent contracting the disease.
I don't understand that. The only logical factor is the question "Are they contagious?" If the answer is no, then detainment in a facility is unnecessary. Home monitoring is more than enough.
I understand completely how you get the disease. I also understand that I don't trust the medical professionals to act responsibility after returning from West Africa.
You think they would let themselves get deathly ill and fling their Ebola poop on the public? Even if they wanted to, they wouldn't have the strength, probably.
and I bet dollars to donuts that is what is driving the 21 day quarantine.
There is no mandated 21-day quarantine, in any state, including NJ, for asymptomatic people who have tested negative. The reason for the 21-day window for home monitoring is because science. 20.1 days is the longest suspected incubation time ever recorded.