Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 4:48 pm
Love the whining.
Page 3 of 4
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 4:51 pm
If you say so. I certainly didn't.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:26 pm
I think LSU beats VaTech for the B1G. What say you, DSL?
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:29 pm
Hard to say.
Indiana got their first Big10 win today. Good for them. Beat the SEC East champ and went 1-7 in the Big10. Solid season for them. Beat the SEC East Champ. Yep.
Reminder: The SEC is just light years better than everyone. They only have 9 weak teams out of 14.
Indiana got their first Big10 win today. Good for them. Beat the SEC East champ and went 1-7 in the Big10. Solid season for them. Beat the SEC East Champ. Yep.
Reminder: The SEC is just light years better than everyone. They only have 9 weak teams out of 14.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:02 pm
Is LSU In the Lesbians or the Lepers division? I can never keep that straight.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:09 pm
Lesbians. I believe the entire East Division has been disowned and exiled. Hence they are the Lepers
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:09 pm
And on a serious note, DSL:
There is only one truly weak team in the SEC: Vandy. The rest are a collection of mediocre, decent and good.
All have flaws. All have been beaten, most multiple times. If Bama wins the next two games, the SEC will have one (1) team in the playoff. If the Tide slips against either set of Tigers remaining (very possible), the SEC will be shut out of the inaugural CFB playoff.
So, I'm not sure what perceived insults you're titling at, DSL. But you seem to be having fun, so knock yourself out, Quixote.
There is only one truly weak team in the SEC: Vandy. The rest are a collection of mediocre, decent and good.
All have flaws. All have been beaten, most multiple times. If Bama wins the next two games, the SEC will have one (1) team in the playoff. If the Tide slips against either set of Tigers remaining (very possible), the SEC will be shut out of the inaugural CFB playoff.
So, I'm not sure what perceived insults you're titling at, DSL. But you seem to be having fun, so knock yourself out, Quixote.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:27 pm
Well, even Verne and Danielson just now, normally loyal SEC ball-washers, admitted that with the day the SEC had, they did not deserve a second playoff spot. Thankfully, Miss State is going to lose anyways and make that a definite.
Look, we all know the SEC is the best. I'm just tired of hearing, every single year, SEC honks in the media insist that an SEC team can have one or even two more losses than anyone else and still be ranked higher, have a BCS spot reserved, or be a lock for the playoff...simply because the SEC is ridiculously harder than all the other P5 conferences.
Look, we all know the SEC is the best. I'm just tired of hearing, every single year, SEC honks in the media insist that an SEC team can have one or even two more losses than anyone else and still be ranked higher, have a BCS spot reserved, or be a lock for the playoff...simply because the SEC is ridiculously harder than all the other P5 conferences.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:58 pm
Show us on the doll where the bad SEC hurt you.
The SEC has been at the top of the game for 8 years or so. So, yeah, we have some in the media who sing our praises. Just as the Big Ten had when they were on top and the BigXII when they were. When that pendulum swings in another direction, someone shoot me if I bitch and cry because some talking head on ESPN Ocho sings their praises like some rival fans do now.
The SEC has been at the top of the game for 8 years or so. So, yeah, we have some in the media who sing our praises. Just as the Big Ten had when they were on top and the BigXII when they were. When that pendulum swings in another direction, someone shoot me if I bitch and cry because some talking head on ESPN Ocho sings their praises like some rival fans do now.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 9:15 pm
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 9:25 pm
Not me. You, kind sir, are the one with rage. I am the confused guy sitting over here who doesn't understand the rage and SEC angst.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 9:34 pm
You are the one, sir, who, during the Iron Bowl, is racing to defend Missouri against charges of being Indiana's bitch. Because S-E-C! S-E-C!
Good grief, Musburger verbally fellating Nick Saban on national tv. I'd forgotten how grating he is. Thank goodness he's been exiled to SEC Network Island, forgotten by most of the country. Only thing that could improve this broadcast is Finebaum making an appearance.
Good grief, Musburger verbally fellating Nick Saban on national tv. I'd forgotten how grating he is. Thank goodness he's been exiled to SEC Network Island, forgotten by most of the country. Only thing that could improve this broadcast is Finebaum making an appearance.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 9:55 pm
No. I am a tit for tat game. If you rush to promote YOUR Hoosiers' win early in the year, I do the same with VaTech and LSU.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 12:23 am
Fienbaum is on. He's on the SEC network with the game on in the background and live call in. "Making history". I agree about Brent. At least now I don't have to hear "Herbie" this and "Herbie" that. Talk about fellating, Palmer is smoking the Kiffin pole.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:24 am
Palmer is terrible. He has some good analysis, but his narcisism and inane babble is mind numbing. I can stand him when Pollack works the booth with him because Pollack shuts his tangents down quickly, but him and Mussberger together is JFA
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:44 am
I hate all of the announcers. The best, recently, was Ron Franklin. Him, and Gottfried used to be great.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:46 am
The thing about Franklin was he said something in a meeting that was wrong, and they tossed him, seems like he could have been suspended and come back the next year.
During a production meeting prior to ESPN's telecast of the Chick-fil-A Bowl on December 31, 2010, Franklin addressed sideline reporter Jeannine Edwards in a condescending tone as "sweet baby"; when she objected, Franklin called her an "asshole". The incident was reported to ESPN by another colleague, and ESPN tried to pull Franklin from the Chick Fil-A coverage that night but was unable; instead, Franklin was removed from ESPN Radio's coverage of the 2011 Fiesta Bowl the following day.[6] [7]
Franklin apologized for his remarks the following Monday and said he deserved to be pulled from the Fiesta Bowl. However, ESPN fired Franklin the following day; in a statement, ESPN noted, "Based on what occurred last Friday, we have ended our relationship with him."[1]
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:43 am
Rickart is going to blow a fucking gasket if you keep bringing up IU football and them beating a SEC division champ.
Trust me, the last thing you want is a whiney bitchy Rickart.
Trust me, the last thing you want is a whiney bitchy Rickart.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 7:54 pm
Hoosiers, heh.
Re: Missouri Tigers
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 9:21 pm
Yes, I still miss Keith Jackson and Frank Broyles.AlabamAlum wrote:I hate all of the announcers. The best, recently, was Ron Franklin. Him, and Gottfried used to be great.